<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: CC Int Stat Report	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/cc-int-stat-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/cc-int-stat-report/</link>
	<description>Something Can Be Done About It</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 05:28:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: MJ		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/cc-int-stat-report/#comment-44384</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 05:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=17510#comment-44384</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/cc-int-stat-report/#comment-44383&quot;&gt;Mike Rinder&lt;/a&gt;.

That&#039;s what I thought, thanks. ;-)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/cc-int-stat-report/#comment-44383">Mike Rinder</a>.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what I thought, thanks. 😉</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Rinder		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/cc-int-stat-report/#comment-44383</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Rinder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 04:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=17510#comment-44383</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/cc-int-stat-report/#comment-44379&quot;&gt;MJ&lt;/a&gt;.

He finds lost tech, comes up with &quot;why&#039;s&quot; and generates &quot;reasons to collect.&quot;  Those are his 3 VFPs.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/cc-int-stat-report/#comment-44379">MJ</a>.</p>
<p>He finds lost tech, comes up with &#8220;why&#8217;s&#8221; and generates &#8220;reasons to collect.&#8221;  Those are his 3 VFPs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MJ		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/cc-int-stat-report/#comment-44379</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 04:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=17510#comment-44379</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/cc-int-stat-report/#comment-44365&quot;&gt;Foolproof&lt;/a&gt;.

A little off the subject - I think Dave stole James Brown&#039;s line about being the hardest working man in show business to the idea that he (the dope, er, I mean pope) is the hardest working man in Scientology. One thing I don&#039;t quite get is his product. What does he actually produce besides misery?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/cc-int-stat-report/#comment-44365">Foolproof</a>.</p>
<p>A little off the subject &#8211; I think Dave stole James Brown&#8217;s line about being the hardest working man in show business to the idea that he (the dope, er, I mean pope) is the hardest working man in Scientology. One thing I don&#8217;t quite get is his product. What does he actually produce besides misery?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Foolproof		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/cc-int-stat-report/#comment-44365</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Foolproof]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 01:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=17510#comment-44365</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/cc-int-stat-report/#comment-44280&quot;&gt;plainoldthetan&lt;/a&gt;.

The Course Schedules &quot;HCO PL&quot; is a 1990s invention which contradicts the 1964 (actual) HCO PL called The Foundation&quot; which gives course times and schedules for Foundation Orgs and as far as I recall Day Orgs as well (by elimination). There is no mention of &quot;special course rooms&quot; etc. in this policy and is a completely invented arbitrary. This &quot;enforcing of schedules&quot; came about when rabid SO &quot;execs&quot; wanted all public always on course so that they could plunder them on any day of the week, plus I suppose envy that as they could not have weekends off then neither should students. I suppose a few clever students referred these rabid registrar dogs to the original LRH HCO PL and thus they had to invent another &quot;HCO PL&quot; to justify and beat down those who complained. But people who complain these days are few and far between in the &quot;pod person&quot; ranks of the remaining Church public. But this &quot;HCO PL&quot; was invented by Compilations Unit/Miscavige to justify to themselves that they are now not violating real HCO Policy. So &quot;it&#039;s all ok now&quot;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/cc-int-stat-report/#comment-44280">plainoldthetan</a>.</p>
<p>The Course Schedules &#8220;HCO PL&#8221; is a 1990s invention which contradicts the 1964 (actual) HCO PL called The Foundation&#8221; which gives course times and schedules for Foundation Orgs and as far as I recall Day Orgs as well (by elimination). There is no mention of &#8220;special course rooms&#8221; etc. in this policy and is a completely invented arbitrary. This &#8220;enforcing of schedules&#8221; came about when rabid SO &#8220;execs&#8221; wanted all public always on course so that they could plunder them on any day of the week, plus I suppose envy that as they could not have weekends off then neither should students. I suppose a few clever students referred these rabid registrar dogs to the original LRH HCO PL and thus they had to invent another &#8220;HCO PL&#8221; to justify and beat down those who complained. But people who complain these days are few and far between in the &#8220;pod person&#8221; ranks of the remaining Church public. But this &#8220;HCO PL&#8221; was invented by Compilations Unit/Miscavige to justify to themselves that they are now not violating real HCO Policy. So &#8220;it&#8217;s all ok now&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jgg2012		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/cc-int-stat-report/#comment-44354</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jgg2012]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 01:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=17510#comment-44354</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/cc-int-stat-report/#comment-44323&quot;&gt;Pepper&lt;/a&gt;.

I think they mean &quot;disseminating to the financially able&quot;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/cc-int-stat-report/#comment-44323">Pepper</a>.</p>
<p>I think they mean &#8220;disseminating to the financially able&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: basketballjane		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/cc-int-stat-report/#comment-44334</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[basketballjane]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 23:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=17510#comment-44334</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/cc-int-stat-report/#comment-44280&quot;&gt;plainoldthetan&lt;/a&gt;.

The definition of Celebrity, per LRH, is pretty loosy goosy to begin with. I used to know it verbatim but it is essentially any person who is important in their field, profession their friends, family and associates. So entourage people count. If your uncle is a well known doctor in Beverly Hills you count. If you are an &quot;ACTOR&quot; and by that I mean you go on auditions and hope to some day land ANY role anywhere you count.
The purge came when it was discovered that a ton of ExSO from PAC and other upper orgs were getting services at CCI. They were doing that to avoid being seen by the people they had once worked with. Also like you pointed out everyone had gotten themselves onto some sort of special schedule.
That was a nightmare for us back in the day. We even tried having a special schedules course room for like a week. We all knew that every course room was pretty much special schedule.
We did, at least when I was working, got many people through checksheets in correct time. Mostly the last 3 days of course with three sups working one on one and coaching the students through EVERYTHING ourselves, you know totally &quot;Standard tech&quot;. Hahaha.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/cc-int-stat-report/#comment-44280">plainoldthetan</a>.</p>
<p>The definition of Celebrity, per LRH, is pretty loosy goosy to begin with. I used to know it verbatim but it is essentially any person who is important in their field, profession their friends, family and associates. So entourage people count. If your uncle is a well known doctor in Beverly Hills you count. If you are an &#8220;ACTOR&#8221; and by that I mean you go on auditions and hope to some day land ANY role anywhere you count.<br />
The purge came when it was discovered that a ton of ExSO from PAC and other upper orgs were getting services at CCI. They were doing that to avoid being seen by the people they had once worked with. Also like you pointed out everyone had gotten themselves onto some sort of special schedule.<br />
That was a nightmare for us back in the day. We even tried having a special schedules course room for like a week. We all knew that every course room was pretty much special schedule.<br />
We did, at least when I was working, got many people through checksheets in correct time. Mostly the last 3 days of course with three sups working one on one and coaching the students through EVERYTHING ourselves, you know totally &#8220;Standard tech&#8221;. Hahaha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Pepper		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/cc-int-stat-report/#comment-44323</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pepper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 21:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=17510#comment-44323</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/cc-int-stat-report/#comment-44239&quot;&gt;1subgenius&lt;/a&gt;.

&quot;Scientology is for the Able.&quot;

Remember that one?  I heard it many times when I was in and struggling to pay for that next OT level or to stay on the one I was on at the time. 

This is the biggest justifier to charge exorbitant prices for services which are supposed to be &quot;vital&quot; to the continued existence of mankind and planet Earth, not to mention religious pratice or enlightenment. 

I read not too long ago that the average American makes around $30,000 per year. How is the US going to get cleared on that income?  It will never happen.  Except for &quot;the able.&quot;

This concept always bothered me because it indicates that only people who make enough money to pay are &quot;the able.&quot;  There are plenty of good, productive, valuable people out in the world who may not happen to be high income earners.  This doesn&#039;t make them any less &quot;able.&quot;

&quot;Disseminating to the Able&quot; also reeks of the &#039;Us versus Them&#039; mentality that runs rampant in the organization, oops I mean Cult.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/cc-int-stat-report/#comment-44239">1subgenius</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;Scientology is for the Able.&#8221;</p>
<p>Remember that one?  I heard it many times when I was in and struggling to pay for that next OT level or to stay on the one I was on at the time. </p>
<p>This is the biggest justifier to charge exorbitant prices for services which are supposed to be &#8220;vital&#8221; to the continued existence of mankind and planet Earth, not to mention religious pratice or enlightenment. </p>
<p>I read not too long ago that the average American makes around $30,000 per year. How is the US going to get cleared on that income?  It will never happen.  Except for &#8220;the able.&#8221;</p>
<p>This concept always bothered me because it indicates that only people who make enough money to pay are &#8220;the able.&#8221;  There are plenty of good, productive, valuable people out in the world who may not happen to be high income earners.  This doesn&#8217;t make them any less &#8220;able.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Disseminating to the Able&#8221; also reeks of the &#8216;Us versus Them&#8217; mentality that runs rampant in the organization, oops I mean Cult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: remoteviewed		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/cc-int-stat-report/#comment-44322</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[remoteviewed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 21:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=17510#comment-44322</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/cc-int-stat-report/#comment-44242&quot;&gt;Robert Almblad&lt;/a&gt;.

Good analysis of the scene Robert or.....more accurately the situation being the furthest departure from the ideal scene.

I mean when I first got into Scientology actual OTs those who were trained as well were looked at with a degree of awe.

Maybe it was undeserved in many cases but in some it was not.

Now they are just some shmuck like Pat Parody who can&#039;t even put a coherent sentence together taking longer on his objectives than most heavy drug cases I have audited.

Such is the state of &quot;OT&quot; in the Church these days.

I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if your average Joe Public who had just finished reading Creation of Human Ability or 8-80 or 8-8008 and looked at someone like Pat or the untrained Lunatic Fringe they call &quot;OTs&quot; these days and ran the other way.

Or took up TM instead.

Mike,

Thanks for posting the reason why we have Clive Raving (mad) going on and on and on...about 10000 NOTs.

Again Ron makes a comment based on his observations and it then becomes &quot;policy&quot; in the crazy Bizarro world of altered importances known as the &quot;Church of Scientology&quot; these days.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/cc-int-stat-report/#comment-44242">Robert Almblad</a>.</p>
<p>Good analysis of the scene Robert or&#8230;..more accurately the situation being the furthest departure from the ideal scene.</p>
<p>I mean when I first got into Scientology actual OTs those who were trained as well were looked at with a degree of awe.</p>
<p>Maybe it was undeserved in many cases but in some it was not.</p>
<p>Now they are just some shmuck like Pat Parody who can&#8217;t even put a coherent sentence together taking longer on his objectives than most heavy drug cases I have audited.</p>
<p>Such is the state of &#8220;OT&#8221; in the Church these days.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if your average Joe Public who had just finished reading Creation of Human Ability or 8-80 or 8-8008 and looked at someone like Pat or the untrained Lunatic Fringe they call &#8220;OTs&#8221; these days and ran the other way.</p>
<p>Or took up TM instead.</p>
<p>Mike,</p>
<p>Thanks for posting the reason why we have Clive Raving (mad) going on and on and on&#8230;about 10000 NOTs.</p>
<p>Again Ron makes a comment based on his observations and it then becomes &#8220;policy&#8221; in the crazy Bizarro world of altered importances known as the &#8220;Church of Scientology&#8221; these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MJ		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/cc-int-stat-report/#comment-44317</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 21:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=17510#comment-44317</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/cc-int-stat-report/#comment-44306&quot;&gt;Old Surfer Dude&lt;/a&gt;.

You were suppressed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/cc-int-stat-report/#comment-44306">Old Surfer Dude</a>.</p>
<p>You were suppressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: vbaumann		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/cc-int-stat-report/#comment-44308</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vbaumann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 21:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=17510#comment-44308</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[CC Int took me in as a &quot;celebrity&quot; when I wasn&#039;t. They qualified me because I knew someone who was a kinda sorta celebrity. Talk about reaching.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CC Int took me in as a &#8220;celebrity&#8221; when I wasn&#8217;t. They qualified me because I knew someone who was a kinda sorta celebrity. Talk about reaching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
