Btw Ralph, to my understanding, it’s DUPLICATION, that counts, not the time taken to achieve it.

With pleasure Ralph…. Enough to discern who and what I’m dealing with. My current mix includes
dealing with dangerous, hardened criminals! …Hope that helps.

calvin – Phil said some sensible things. Please tell us all how many hours of auditing and training (hours reading stuf on the bus to work do not count) you have had.

Dani thank you very much for the invitation! I will be very happy to come back to Haifa. I will put all positive thoughts and we stay in touch.

And thank you for all that you and for sharing the success.

The ruling class is at false significance s.

They use police types to control the masses beneath them as menacing particles.

From ORG series 23.

(HCO PL 16 February 1971,

Lines and Terminals)

There is a scale concerning Lines and Terminals.

ASSOCIATED TERMINALS

SIGNIFICANCES

FALSE TERMINALS

MISDIRECTED LINES

WRONG PARTICLES

FALSE SIGNIFICANCES

(Rumors)

MYSTERIOUS TERMINALS

CHAOTIC LINES

MENACING PARTICLES

DANGEROUS IMPRESSIONS

NON-EXISTENT TERMINALS

NON-EXISTENT LINES

NON-EXISTENT PARTICLES

UNCONSCIOUS IMPULSES

THE CHAOS OF UNHAPPY NOTHINGNESS

The purpose of police is to run control on the masses and cover the asses of the ruling class.
This is why David Miscavige is never sent to the M.A.A.. The M.A.A. is not for HIM. The M.A.A. is not for the ruling class. It is to control the class that is ruled, and cover the ass of the ruling class. That is why spokespeople and O.S.A. for the Church spread false reports to the media and lie to millions with no regard for ethics and justice. It is NOT for THEM.

I think the suppression in the Orgs comes from within, not from with out. It the police mocked up to rule and control the class that is ruled. But in Scientology you have people come into self determinsim and they choose NOT to be ruled by Officers of any sort. And they bust out the back door.

I think the suppression in the Church comes from the ruling class. And as people move up the bridge, if they really make it, they get to a place where they do not want to be shuffled around by the ruling class.

This is ANCIENT social intercourse. It is not new at all.

Where’s the ‘like’ button? Well said, Moonshot.

You are completely missing the point. Dani is not saying that every post in an organisation should be elected or up for a vote. The crucial point here is one of ownership and ultimate responsiblilty. Like in a nation state or large business corporation. In these cases there is a form and hierarchy to the org and it can be run on governing policiies and most posts are appointed. But if things go very badly, the voters or shareholders…the ultimate stakeholders, can replace top managemnt if its needed.

Dani’s point is that LRH doesnt ever really address WHO owns the damn thing. Dani is saying we can take responisbility for that and creat orgs owned by the entire public and ultimately, then policy and tech can go in and the orgs can grow organically as they will be responsive both to the needs of the public and the reality of the enviroment they operate in.