Fool,

Just about everything….It would take much less time to attempt to come up with something he got correct. The man was a buffoon

Kat

Fool,
To use your terminology, “firstly”, you show your own narcissism in misreading the comment. I never even implied you were in OSA. Secondly, wog was and is used both as a derogatory comment and it is a racist slur by definition. Hubbard even defines it that way when he pinpointed a group: “worthy oriental gentleman”. Again- “oriental in itself is derogatory, and by singling out a group for a derogatory comment (and yes, he meant it that way- just read his comments about his take on bathing habits and you are left with NO doubt that it was derogatory and racist in the most disgusting way). Finally (or “lastly”) you seem to be under some sort of mistaken idea that you have proven something- you have yet to prove that you have an IQ above 5, much less any salient point that anyone can find.

Let the frothing of the mouth begin….

Kat

Cue crickets…

Foolproof your silence is deafening.

Another question for you Foolproof.
Either the “tech” worked and Hubblard was defrauding the government by receiving Disability payments when there was nothing wrong with him…
OR the “tech” doesn’t/never did work and he/Miscravige leprechaun did/are defrauding their parisheners…
Which is it?
Either way they’re both FRAUDS!

….(silence)….

“You fool, of course that’s in DMSMH and that’s proof enough for me!!!!!111!!!!eleven!!!111!!!”

/s

Foolproof – I left in1982 and didn’t come across False Data Stripping. The term seems self explanatory, examining false information (data) upon which one is operating to possible benefit.

Discussing how, if or why any of the numerous Scientology procedures work on a blog is a thing of the past, particularly on a daily blog which is all that is left. I suppose it remains a topic of conversation in Indie groups.

I stay away from speculation on people’s motivation. If False Data Stripping on an Anti Scientology blog is “good for your soul” enjoy yourself! My facetious comment above was mostly a suggestion to lighten up a bit. 🙂

Foolproof said:”Does Mike say to you “drop a mention of Foolproof in your comments as my stats are down!”, or was it something I said sometime? Or both?”

Mike throws up interesting thought-pieces for us to discuss. My comments on your failure to discuss the TOPICS are solely because I like bull bating you back; it’s almost TOO easy, but gives me a measure of satisfaction in my golden years.

How ’bout just about EVERYTHING he said? After 40 years of recovery, I can’t think of ONE thing he said that was actually true and correctly described the real world or its inhabitants. AND I found MANY instances where acting like a scientologist was the exact wrong thing to do.