Will you be making amends to IAS for every BT or other space alien parasite who has committed a crime at some point in the past ???

But then look no further than their psychotically insane fundraisers … ANYTHING to mine your wallet.

Yes, you do not exaggerate. Now ethics officers collude with regs to extract more money from members.

Original Sin is a little different, since it’s not something you have confess or repent. Christian churches say everyone is sinful, but there’s a way out that does not demand money. All of the costs of sin are paid via spiritual stuff like a commitment / vow, saying prayers, etc.
Indulgences are still around, but instead of being pay-to-sin, they cover stuff like allowing people to break a rule without it being a sin – when St. Patty’s day is a Friday in Lent, you can still eat Corned beef.

Scientology looks at all the bad stuff Catholics that led to the reformation and double down on them. OSA has less justice than the Inquisition, and the Ethics for profit system makes the indulgence system look like a joke.

Skyler, it’s of course necessary for the ‘ethics’ “handlings” to be arbitrary and capricious. If the marks could figure out the scam, they’d mock up the least-expensive imaginary transgression every time.

Let’s look at these 2 women.

Woman 1 (and her husband) drives a car with fumes in the gas tank and bald tires, but forked over $3000 to the $cam.

Woman 2 wears a pearl necklace, drives her own car and only handed over $100 to the $cam.

Evidently they couldn’t push W2’s buttons like they could W1’s.

As you wrote: They get rich off of real and imagined O/W’s. Even in the 1970’s they shrugged off my referencing the HCOB titled O/W A LIMITED THEORY ( 22Dec1960) and the lessened importance of O/Ws

It did not fit their agenda even then.

O
f course the “sins” are endless. Whenever he wants you to buy more “indulgences”, he can direct you to mock up yet another past life transgression to atone for.

‘Solving problems we never knew we had,’ a scieno original