<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Regraded Being	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/friday-regraded-being-71/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/friday-regraded-being-71/</link>
	<description>Something Can Be Done About It</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2016 02:41:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Old Surfer Dude		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/friday-regraded-being-71/#comment-150665</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Old Surfer Dude]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2016 02:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=30914#comment-150665</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/friday-regraded-being-71/#comment-150605&quot;&gt;Mike Wynski&lt;/a&gt;.

You can only post that if you&#039;re a true parrot head!  My wife and I just saw the last Buffet show at Verizon Center here in Orange County, CA.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/friday-regraded-being-71/#comment-150605">Mike Wynski</a>.</p>
<p>You can only post that if you&#8217;re a true parrot head!  My wife and I just saw the last Buffet show at Verizon Center here in Orange County, CA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Rinder		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/friday-regraded-being-71/#comment-150624</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Rinder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2016 18:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=30914#comment-150624</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/friday-regraded-being-71/#comment-150619&quot;&gt;Espiando&lt;/a&gt;.

Waste of time]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/friday-regraded-being-71/#comment-150619">Espiando</a>.</p>
<p>Waste of time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Rinder		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/friday-regraded-being-71/#comment-150623</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Rinder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2016 18:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=30914#comment-150623</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/friday-regraded-being-71/#comment-150621&quot;&gt;Mike Wynski&lt;/a&gt;.

More waste of time]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/friday-regraded-being-71/#comment-150621">Mike Wynski</a>.</p>
<p>More waste of time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Wynski		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/friday-regraded-being-71/#comment-150621</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Wynski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2016 18:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=30914#comment-150621</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/friday-regraded-being-71/#comment-150597&quot;&gt;Foolproof&lt;/a&gt;.

Fool, as I wasn&#039;t preaching anything, simply pointing out what ANOTHER person rejected, I haven&#039;t a clue what you trying to talk about

Maybe you could clarify based on what I said?  Or, were you commenting on another person&#039;s posts?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/friday-regraded-being-71/#comment-150597">Foolproof</a>.</p>
<p>Fool, as I wasn&#8217;t preaching anything, simply pointing out what ANOTHER person rejected, I haven&#8217;t a clue what you trying to talk about</p>
<p>Maybe you could clarify based on what I said?  Or, were you commenting on another person&#8217;s posts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: marildi		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/friday-regraded-being-71/#comment-150620</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marildi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2016 18:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=30914#comment-150620</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/friday-regraded-being-71/#comment-150571&quot;&gt;I Yawnalot&lt;/a&gt;.

Yawn: &quot;To me he left no randomity of being or becoming a life unto yourself or creating with another within his organisation, it all became quite mathematical.&quot; 

In a sense you are right. But in the basic principles, &quot;randomity of being or becoming . . . &quot; was actually included, as can be seen from the following:

&quot;There is no thought or statement here that any one of these eight dynamics is more important than the others. While they are categories (divisions) of the broad game of life they are not necessarily equal to each other. It will be found amongst individuals that each person stresses one of the dynamics more than the others, or may stress a combination of dynamics as more important-than other combinations.&quot; (FOT)

But you are right when it comes to &quot;within his organization.&quot; It does seem that he ignored the misinterpretations around him.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/friday-regraded-being-71/#comment-150571">I Yawnalot</a>.</p>
<p>Yawn: &#8220;To me he left no randomity of being or becoming a life unto yourself or creating with another within his organisation, it all became quite mathematical.&#8221; </p>
<p>In a sense you are right. But in the basic principles, &#8220;randomity of being or becoming . . . &#8221; was actually included, as can be seen from the following:</p>
<p>&#8220;There is no thought or statement here that any one of these eight dynamics is more important than the others. While they are categories (divisions) of the broad game of life they are not necessarily equal to each other. It will be found amongst individuals that each person stresses one of the dynamics more than the others, or may stress a combination of dynamics as more important-than other combinations.&#8221; (FOT)</p>
<p>But you are right when it comes to &#8220;within his organization.&#8221; It does seem that he ignored the misinterpretations around him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Espiando		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/friday-regraded-being-71/#comment-150619</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Espiando]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2016 18:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=30914#comment-150619</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/friday-regraded-being-71/#comment-150589&quot;&gt;Foolproof&lt;/a&gt;.

He not only condoned murder, he freaking published it in the Auditor, giving out a list of squirrels and telling people to use Process R2-45 on them.  And it wasn&#039;t a joke.

And I&#039;m not going to confess my &quot;crimes&quot;.  It&#039;s up to you to find them.  Remember, all critics have crimes, and you need to find them to destroy me.  That&#039;s Ron&#039;s command.  As an old GO person, you should know this.  So get to work and start destroying me.  The first thing is to start calling me a name that resonates in places outside of Great Britain.  I think there are all of three Nandos in the US.  You need to brush up on your KFC Triangle.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/friday-regraded-being-71/#comment-150589">Foolproof</a>.</p>
<p>He not only condoned murder, he freaking published it in the Auditor, giving out a list of squirrels and telling people to use Process R2-45 on them.  And it wasn&#8217;t a joke.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m not going to confess my &#8220;crimes&#8221;.  It&#8217;s up to you to find them.  Remember, all critics have crimes, and you need to find them to destroy me.  That&#8217;s Ron&#8217;s command.  As an old GO person, you should know this.  So get to work and start destroying me.  The first thing is to start calling me a name that resonates in places outside of Great Britain.  I think there are all of three Nandos in the US.  You need to brush up on your KFC Triangle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: marildi		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/friday-regraded-being-71/#comment-150615</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marildi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2016 17:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=30914#comment-150615</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/friday-regraded-being-71/#comment-150567&quot;&gt;Brian&lt;/a&gt;.

Brian: &quot;Wise men produce men and women of a higher caliber. I’ll let you figure out what that quality is. It certainly is not what is produced by studying destruction of critics.&quot;

Does the quality of a higher caliber of men and women include using words to constantly berate another being - in an attempt to &quot;ruin him utterly&quot;? I don&#039;t think wise men would see it that way.

What you are doing is not only a version of &quot;ruin utterly&quot; - it is also a version of &quot;the ends justify the means.&quot; Perhaps you are becoming - in your zealous quest - exactly what you resist.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/friday-regraded-being-71/#comment-150567">Brian</a>.</p>
<p>Brian: &#8220;Wise men produce men and women of a higher caliber. I’ll let you figure out what that quality is. It certainly is not what is produced by studying destruction of critics.&#8221;</p>
<p>Does the quality of a higher caliber of men and women include using words to constantly berate another being &#8211; in an attempt to &#8220;ruin him utterly&#8221;? I don&#8217;t think wise men would see it that way.</p>
<p>What you are doing is not only a version of &#8220;ruin utterly&#8221; &#8211; it is also a version of &#8220;the ends justify the means.&#8221; Perhaps you are becoming &#8211; in your zealous quest &#8211; exactly what you resist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brian		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/friday-regraded-being-71/#comment-150608</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2016 16:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=30914#comment-150608</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/friday-regraded-being-71/#comment-150590&quot;&gt;Foolproof&lt;/a&gt;.

Foolproof, I&#039;ve been trying to ask you this question for a while now:

Is Scientology the &quot;only route out&quot; &quot;the most workable&quot; the &quot;only hope for mankind, whereby if it&#039;s completely annihilated mankind will &quot;not have another chance?&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/friday-regraded-being-71/#comment-150590">Foolproof</a>.</p>
<p>Foolproof, I&#8217;ve been trying to ask you this question for a while now:</p>
<p>Is Scientology the &#8220;only route out&#8221; &#8220;the most workable&#8221; the &#8220;only hope for mankind, whereby if it&#8217;s completely annihilated mankind will &#8220;not have another chance?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Wynski		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/friday-regraded-being-71/#comment-150605</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Wynski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2016 15:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=30914#comment-150605</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/friday-regraded-being-71/#comment-150492&quot;&gt;George Layton&lt;/a&gt;.

How &#039;bout a cheesburger in paradise? 
https://youtu.be/jBsPZV14I-k?t=5s]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/friday-regraded-being-71/#comment-150492">George Layton</a>.</p>
<p>How &#8217;bout a cheesburger in paradise?<br />
<a href="https://youtu.be/jBsPZV14I-k?t=5s" rel="nofollow ugc">https://youtu.be/jBsPZV14I-k?t=5s</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Foolproof		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/friday-regraded-being-71/#comment-150597</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Foolproof]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2016 14:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=30914#comment-150597</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/friday-regraded-being-71/#comment-150578&quot;&gt;Mike Wynski&lt;/a&gt;.

Wynski, you can practice what you are preaching then and &quot;love&quot; Scientology. You can even have a picture of COB on your wall! How about turning the other cheek and not posting any more malicious comments?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/friday-regraded-being-71/#comment-150578">Mike Wynski</a>.</p>
<p>Wynski, you can practice what you are preaching then and &#8220;love&#8221; Scientology. You can even have a picture of COB on your wall! How about turning the other cheek and not posting any more malicious comments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
