Thanx for the info, PeaceMaker. I also ran across several complaints against the facilities in BC – but I am sure it is no different than elsewhere. They sure do like to play musical chairs with their little orgs, probably on purpose to keep a confused trail in their wake of destruction. I am wondering what happened to the huge facility on St Mary’s Lake Rd. That was s 60,000 square ft building with what looks like a lot of acreage shown on the photos. Did they just go belly up and end up at 163 North Ave with Tranquility Detox?

Nana, there are several of us with an interest in tracking Scientology orgs (including missions), their properties, and facilities, though not exactly an organized effort – and unfortunately, without any website as a centralized repository of information.

The Battle Creek org recently moved out of their longstanding location downtown (on East Michigan Avenue, which still shows up on their and Scientology’s websites), to that location further out (on North Avenue, as shows up on their own Facebook page, though not the default one that Facebook creates and which they should have set up to redirect) that shows up as having formerly been used as offices by psychologists, which might lead to some confusion. If the new location is in, or is located adjacent to, Narconon or some related front group, that is news.

Battle Creek has of course long owned the old Hart Hotel and has, typically, long claimed to have imminent plans to turn it into an idea org, that have never come to fruition. And like a couple of other struggling orgs stuck with a property like that which has to be costing them money, they have also from time to time also made claims about at least moving in to and using parts of the old building (presumably to save costs when, like a typical org, they probably can’t pay staff or keep their bathrooms stocked with toilet paper), but have never managed that, either.

@Graham….’Flubturd’….PRICELESS! You just made my day!

Perhaps more like forked tongue.

Well, they’re national holidays, was what I meant. Got your point, though.

And I also believe he’s got a thing for tallER women, as some shorter men do. Again, just my 2 cents.

Reality check: Tom Cruise is hugely wealthy as well as famous and because of that alone could bed and/or marry any number of beautiful women between the ages of 24 and 55. Any number of attractive female Scientologists would fall at his feet to be the next Mr.s Tom Cruise. That’s not his problem. His problem is he’s a star fucker. He doesn’t want to marry a beautiful unknown, someone not in the film industry, even if she has a respectable profession and is devout Scn, etc. etc. Nor does he want to marry a production assistant on one of his films. He doesn’t want a Little Miss Nobody on his arm no matter how young and beautiful she is. He wants a somebody, a woman who’s famous, a STAR. My opinion, my 2 cents.

It would be wrong to conclude that its wrong to help, or to want to help. That’s utterly not true. Just check it out first. Don’t blindly believe anyone or any organization. No one over the age of 12 should be BLINDLY and automatically trusting. As Ronald Reagan famously said, “Trust, but verify”.

Nice guys? Good, helpful women? No doubt these Still Ins are decent and well meaning and interested in helping their fellow man. But they didn’t do their due diligence. Neither did we! So, again, “The Road To Hell Is Paved With Good Intentions”. Ancient wisdom.