Old Surfer Dude, do you have any experience with being a campaign manager? You would be a huge asset and not back down from the cult.

Yes Francois. Advocating gov’t enforced slavery makes ANY sane person angry. Only sociopaths remain blasé while that is advocated.

Thanks for piping up.

Anger issues here…

Wrong dipshit. Opening a business is NOT public service.

“Public service is a service purporting to serve all members of a community. It is usually provided by government to people living within its jurisdiction, either directly (through the public sector) or by financing provision of services.”

It is a PRIVATE ACTIVITY. A lemon aid stand owner does NOT OWN ANYTHING TO ANYONE THAT WALKS UP. The person who walks up to the stand owns NOTHING to the stand owner. They CAN decide to EXCHANGE something each values for something to the other has.

Because I decide to open a business do I now OWE you anything? I doon’t OWE you shit.

Under the constitution the gov’t has ZERO authority to force private associations. The constitution is a list of MAXIMUM gov powers. The role of the gov’t under our constitution is to ensure human rights of Liberty, property and right to life. The US is completely unique in that regard. NO other country’s constitution was designed thus. ALL other constitution are designed so that the national legislature, on its own can decide what rights the people have. Which f course NEVER works. Look at Spain. When people in Barcelona tried to simply cast a ballot asking about opinions of a separate state the gov’t sent armed police into the streets to shoot anyone trying to merely vote.

If the gov’t can force a private person to sell something to a private person then the gov’t can force a private person to make a purchase FROM a private party

In most of Europe (and now the UK) Parliments have passed laws against voicing certain opinions. Doing so gets you jailed. I’m NOT talking about making ANY type of threat of violence.

Of course those governments feels comfortable doing such criminal acts because the people allowed themselves to be disarmed. Silly sheeple. Freedom is for those that can enforce it AGAINST a psycho gov’t. All others put your chains on.

It’d be GREAT if Mark could do two things at once: 1) Run for office, and 2) Attack scn’s bad behavior at the same time. I suspect #1 will be challenging enough. Perhaps it might be better to get on the board first, THEN think about making scn’s crimes better-known locally. I wouldn’t be surprised if the locals really don’t know anything about them other than them being the creepy people downtown sometimes seen in sweaty, out-of-place uniforms. Let scn take the opening shot and hold your position as the local resident running for office who they’re out to ‘get’ for no good reason. BUT that will require solid hard evidence that doesn’t sound like a ‘conspiracy theory’ even if it IS a conspiracy orchestrated by OSA. Lock down the people and their employers before you start your counter-attacks. Nothing not rock-solid will be useable and unassailable by their bevy of lawyers.

I also say “good luck” and record ANY incident with scn/scns, or MIGHT later turn out to be scns. Don’t give the B*******s a chance. As I typed that, I thought that you should do a documentary & be videoed any time you’re near the public. Could be a plain-jane “What’s it like to run for office in a sleepy little backwater town” or could be “Mark vs. Goliath, the movie, take 2.” I believe you’ve got some good footage for the prequel, “take One”, already.

Wish I could be down there with you to confuse the clams with ANOTHER guy walking around town with a snow-white beard. Give them another target to shadow. HEY! Why don’t we have a bearded-guy ‘reunion’ to REALLY stress them out? I’d be the first on-site except that I’m not very mobile these days.

Proprietors have chosen to be in the business of serving the public. If they belonged to a white identity church, should they then be able to refuse service to blacks and others? A serious Aryan believer wouldn’t want to serve the inferior Slavic race either, which would including Poles – i.e., people with “ski” at the end of their names.

And what would prevent a group from buying up enough key businesses in an area that they can virtually force people they disagree with to move by denial of essential services – exactly what was done under racial segregation? That’s what the FLDS cult did in Utah and Arizona, turning towns into virtual small-scale theocracies – and there are reports of shades of that in downtown Clearwater, where they can make it hard for an outsider to live or run a business.

Got it. Thanks, Wyn. You’re teaching me something. Didn’t know that “freedom of association” applied that way. Now, not at all to cavil with you about this, but because I’m curious: what about a store owner who refuses service to minorities? Or an African American who refuses to serve or sell to white people? I’m thinking such reasons would need to be PROVEN as being discriminatory with regard to race, color, nationality, religion, etc., and not directed against the individual himself or herself, which latter would come under the general heading of refusing service to an individual. Am I missing something, and why am I even asking that?