Also, when we see lawyers trying serving the same summons I wonder why they don’t mention that lawyers X, Y and Z previously tried to serve Miscavage with this same negative result and it’s obvious he’s evading service? I would think it would be an obvious tactic, but I wonder if they look to prior cases to see what worked. They keep reinventing the wheel.

I saw a case where this lawyer won against a sheriff’s dept when they destroyed a portion of a woman’s property trying to get a perp. Most of those attempts fail because they claim immunity. He, seeing this lousy track record, instead argued that the police used eminent domain to take over her property and per that, she was entitled to reimbursement. He won.

Mimsey