hehehehe.

Dude I remember you.
I love most of you videos in YouTube. hehehehe

At this moment I believe that the fear you because, there is no more law manipulations you to keep you away.
Keep the Angry fight Gay Pope, well done! 😀

Actually in one of the $cientology aftermath, she says that Mike was the boss.
That was one of the most noble and humble gesture from Leah,

Splunk not a chance of Pat talking until DM is gone.

We appreciate anything you guys do REGARDLESS of lighting!

I thought the video was awesome. I hope when I pass away that people enjoy all the videos I was in without concern for lighting or sound. trivial.

Well, that sounds very altruistic.

But you have to throw in digs about Chris Shelton and compare him to Karen.

You have no idea of the circumstances under which that video was shot. It was not arranged by either me or Leah and it was that poorly shot and lit opportunity or nothing. I had a short window in LA. iHeart doesn’t do video. They brought in someone who we met as we sat down to record the episode. You imply we don’t understand lighting at all. Watch The Aftermath. There we had some control over cameras and lighting. Are you going to throw shade on that presentation too?

See my response.

Trying to get your videos to a higher tech level is not whining it is an attempt at constructive, helpful criticism. You can’t complain that my Karen DLC videos are “without merit” while your own videos cannot even begin to compete with them technically. Bad lighting simply gets in the way of your message. Such as the bad lighting in Mark Bunker’s Jason Beghe interview which had great content and awful lighting. I’m simply trying to increase the tech legitimacy of your presentations so that new audiences will take the content legitimacy part more seriously.

Come on AGP, was that really necessary?