<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Golden Age Of Repurifying	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/purify/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/purify/</link>
	<description>Something Can Be Done About It</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 13:05:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: hiatus57		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/purify/#comment-50875</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiatus57]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 13:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=18327#comment-50875</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mike,

This is grossly unfair mate.

You forget the fact that the sauna you are talking about is not yet &quot;Ideal&quot; so you should not expect them to get the figures correct.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>This is grossly unfair mate.</p>
<p>You forget the fact that the sauna you are talking about is not yet &#8220;Ideal&#8221; so you should not expect them to get the figures correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Aquamarine		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/purify/#comment-50837</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aquamarine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 01:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=18327#comment-50837</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/purify/#comment-50836&quot;&gt;Aquamarine&lt;/a&gt;.

Oh, and totally spot on observation that if the Purif one did did NOT negatively effect your subsequent auditing, then why re-do the damned thing?  At the time, I didn&#039;t actually ask anyone THAT question, but I definitely was feeling the concept, if you catch my drift.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/purify/#comment-50836">Aquamarine</a>.</p>
<p>Oh, and totally spot on observation that if the Purif one did did NOT negatively effect your subsequent auditing, then why re-do the damned thing?  At the time, I didn&#8217;t actually ask anyone THAT question, but I definitely was feeling the concept, if you catch my drift.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Aquamarine		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/purify/#comment-50836</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aquamarine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 00:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=18327#comment-50836</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mike Rinder, you are THE MAN.  I can&#039;t even wait to read the comments before acking you on this question you posed with regard to the feasiblity of re-doing the Purif.  This is precisely what I asked about re-doing the Purif - if you had drugs or toxins, in your system all along, necessitating a redo NOW, then wouldn&#039;t that negatively effect all the auditing you&#039;ve had to date? Same thing with Objectives: if you didn&#039;t &quot;get&quot; Objectives, wouldn&#039;t that necessitate a re-do of your ENTIRE Bridge?  No one was EVER able to give me straight, sensible answers. So I decided, &quot;Fuck it.  I&#039;m not redoing this stuff&quot;. Thank you, again, Mike!  Ok, now I&#039;m going back to read the comments.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike Rinder, you are THE MAN.  I can&#8217;t even wait to read the comments before acking you on this question you posed with regard to the feasiblity of re-doing the Purif.  This is precisely what I asked about re-doing the Purif &#8211; if you had drugs or toxins, in your system all along, necessitating a redo NOW, then wouldn&#8217;t that negatively effect all the auditing you&#8217;ve had to date? Same thing with Objectives: if you didn&#8217;t &#8220;get&#8221; Objectives, wouldn&#8217;t that necessitate a re-do of your ENTIRE Bridge?  No one was EVER able to give me straight, sensible answers. So I decided, &#8220;Fuck it.  I&#8217;m not redoing this stuff&#8221;. Thank you, again, Mike!  Ok, now I&#8217;m going back to read the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: remoteviewed		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/purify/#comment-50822</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[remoteviewed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 22:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=18327#comment-50822</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/purify/#comment-50726&quot;&gt;WhiteStar&lt;/a&gt;.

&quot;scientology’s reality&quot; is pretty much a generality and besides scientology is a subject not a living entity therefore it doesn&#039;t have any awareness to have a &quot;reality&quot;.

To me it&#039;s like saying according to a toaster&#039;s reality etc....

But anyway, aside from that. I do see your point WS.

For instance I was told by some moron calling himself a &quot;C/S&quot; that anyone who had any Dianetics like HSDC and XDn as an OT was going to be on NOTs longer.

Such bull shit as far as I was concerned. Especially when you read what Ron says in the Auditor and the Mind&#039;s Protection.

But idiots like that get away with such BS because the subjects of the current Organization accept any authoritarian statement by some low life with some braid and a Banana Republic made up title like &quot;COB&quot; for example without question.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/purify/#comment-50726">WhiteStar</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;scientology’s reality&#8221; is pretty much a generality and besides scientology is a subject not a living entity therefore it doesn&#8217;t have any awareness to have a &#8220;reality&#8221;.</p>
<p>To me it&#8217;s like saying according to a toaster&#8217;s reality etc&#8230;.</p>
<p>But anyway, aside from that. I do see your point WS.</p>
<p>For instance I was told by some moron calling himself a &#8220;C/S&#8221; that anyone who had any Dianetics like HSDC and XDn as an OT was going to be on NOTs longer.</p>
<p>Such bull shit as far as I was concerned. Especially when you read what Ron says in the Auditor and the Mind&#8217;s Protection.</p>
<p>But idiots like that get away with such BS because the subjects of the current Organization accept any authoritarian statement by some low life with some braid and a Banana Republic made up title like &#8220;COB&#8221; for example without question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Entheta		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/purify/#comment-50820</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Entheta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 21:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=18327#comment-50820</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This toxicology expert concurs with what you&#039;ve posted here.  It&#039;s not &quot;opinion&quot;, it&#039;s just that radiation and the body don&#039;t work like LRH thought they did.  He was just plain wrong, and it&#039;s not about arguing or blasphemy or &quot;making YOU wrong&quot; or whatever.  

If you met someone who claimed that their &quot;tech&quot; could defy gravity, would you hand them your baby to fling into the air to &quot;just try it out&quot;?  No, you wouldn&#039;t, because you don&#039;t need to be a scientist to just KNOW that his claim is wrong, and your baby is too precious to risk, don&#039;t you think?  

Well, LRH&#039;s claims about drugs and radiation should go into that same category in your mind: just plain not correct, I&#039;m sorry to say...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This toxicology expert concurs with what you&#8217;ve posted here.  It&#8217;s not &#8220;opinion&#8221;, it&#8217;s just that radiation and the body don&#8217;t work like LRH thought they did.  He was just plain wrong, and it&#8217;s not about arguing or blasphemy or &#8220;making YOU wrong&#8221; or whatever.  </p>
<p>If you met someone who claimed that their &#8220;tech&#8221; could defy gravity, would you hand them your baby to fling into the air to &#8220;just try it out&#8221;?  No, you wouldn&#8217;t, because you don&#8217;t need to be a scientist to just KNOW that his claim is wrong, and your baby is too precious to risk, don&#8217;t you think?  </p>
<p>Well, LRH&#8217;s claims about drugs and radiation should go into that same category in your mind: just plain not correct, I&#8217;m sorry to say&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: remoteviewed		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/purify/#comment-50819</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[remoteviewed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 21:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=18327#comment-50819</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/purify/#comment-50721&quot;&gt;Jethro Bodine&lt;/a&gt;.

Maybe so Jethro,

But I figure those cases are pretty rare. I mean once you&#039;ve technically the EP and your case is progressing pretty well. Why bother?

Besides I don&#039;t know any reference anywhere that says you can&#039;t do a sauna every once in while.

Hey way back before the purif. Me and a buddy of mine used to do a sauna and vitamins (especially lots of B1) to rid ourselves of the effects of a hangover.

Worked pretty good ;)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/purify/#comment-50721">Jethro Bodine</a>.</p>
<p>Maybe so Jethro,</p>
<p>But I figure those cases are pretty rare. I mean once you&#8217;ve technically the EP and your case is progressing pretty well. Why bother?</p>
<p>Besides I don&#8217;t know any reference anywhere that says you can&#8217;t do a sauna every once in while.</p>
<p>Hey way back before the purif. Me and a buddy of mine used to do a sauna and vitamins (especially lots of B1) to rid ourselves of the effects of a hangover.</p>
<p>Worked pretty good 😉</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Entheta		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/purify/#comment-50818</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Entheta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 21:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=18327#comment-50818</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[... and now I see this point was covered by others... my apologies for failing to read all comments...

and I&#039;ve also failed to realize how many of you folks really do believe that SCN has something good in it... I believe there is an obvious mountain of evidence to the contrary, but: Best of luck to you, and I really do mean that...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; and now I see this point was covered by others&#8230; my apologies for failing to read all comments&#8230;</p>
<p>and I&#8217;ve also failed to realize how many of you folks really do believe that SCN has something good in it&#8230; I believe there is an obvious mountain of evidence to the contrary, but: Best of luck to you, and I really do mean that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Entheta		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/purify/#comment-50816</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Entheta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 21:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=18327#comment-50816</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi folks -

it is a bit scary to me that no one (well, maybe I didn&#039;t notice it yet) among these comments has mentioned that the entire concept of the PURIF is false, from a simple science point of view.  

I had a friend who tried and tried to get me into SCNTLGY; like a good friend, I read many of the books but found it to be mostly nonsense, especially Hubbard&#039;s writings on radiation, drugs, and the PURIF.  Having studied chemistry/biology/physics etc, one realizes that the premise behind the PURIF is just silly.  

When my old pal told me that he had done the PURIF and re-experienced things like baby aspirin and meth that he&#039;d done many years prior, I patiently explained that water-soluble compounds (like Vitamin C for example) simply cannot be stored in the body long-term, and that even fat-soluble compounds are expelled in shorter periods than that. Further, the idea that &quot;radiation&quot; was coming out of his body (when all that redness is the body&#039;s normal reaction to a large dose of Niacin) was completely contrary to how radiation works... 

I also pointed out how frightening I found it, that his &quot;religion&quot; had convinced him that he had personally experienced things that are just physically impossible.  

He responded by mailing me a disconnection letter.  And that isn&#039;t weird at all...

Anyway, I just found it a bit &quot;off&quot;, I guess, that contributors to this thread are talking about how &quot;wrong&quot; it is that the Tech was changed... when I would hope that folks would be realizing that the Tech itself is useless.    

Good luck in your journeys, and may you avoid things like Scientology in the future.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi folks &#8211;</p>
<p>it is a bit scary to me that no one (well, maybe I didn&#8217;t notice it yet) among these comments has mentioned that the entire concept of the PURIF is false, from a simple science point of view.  </p>
<p>I had a friend who tried and tried to get me into SCNTLGY; like a good friend, I read many of the books but found it to be mostly nonsense, especially Hubbard&#8217;s writings on radiation, drugs, and the PURIF.  Having studied chemistry/biology/physics etc, one realizes that the premise behind the PURIF is just silly.  </p>
<p>When my old pal told me that he had done the PURIF and re-experienced things like baby aspirin and meth that he&#8217;d done many years prior, I patiently explained that water-soluble compounds (like Vitamin C for example) simply cannot be stored in the body long-term, and that even fat-soluble compounds are expelled in shorter periods than that. Further, the idea that &#8220;radiation&#8221; was coming out of his body (when all that redness is the body&#8217;s normal reaction to a large dose of Niacin) was completely contrary to how radiation works&#8230; </p>
<p>I also pointed out how frightening I found it, that his &#8220;religion&#8221; had convinced him that he had personally experienced things that are just physically impossible.  </p>
<p>He responded by mailing me a disconnection letter.  And that isn&#8217;t weird at all&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway, I just found it a bit &#8220;off&#8221;, I guess, that contributors to this thread are talking about how &#8220;wrong&#8221; it is that the Tech was changed&#8230; when I would hope that folks would be realizing that the Tech itself is useless.    </p>
<p>Good luck in your journeys, and may you avoid things like Scientology in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: remoteviewed		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/purify/#comment-50814</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[remoteviewed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 20:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=18327#comment-50814</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/purify/#comment-50732&quot;&gt;Chuck Beatty&lt;/a&gt;.

Yeah gotta admit that&#039;s real quackery there Dan and that the FDA is probably quietly building up a case against him.

Thankfully we have our great and glorious government to save us from ourselves.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/purify/#comment-50732">Chuck Beatty</a>.</p>
<p>Yeah gotta admit that&#8217;s real quackery there Dan and that the FDA is probably quietly building up a case against him.</p>
<p>Thankfully we have our great and glorious government to save us from ourselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dankoon		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/purify/#comment-50800</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dankoon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 19:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=18327#comment-50800</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/purify/#comment-50732&quot;&gt;Chuck Beatty&lt;/a&gt;.

Chuck, most of Mercola&#039;s articles are real quackery. Stuff like &quot;take responsibility for your health,&quot; &quot;eat healthy food,&quot; &quot;exercise,&quot; &quot;avoid toxic chemicals,&quot; you know, the stuff that doesn&#039;t cost anything and which cuts into Big Medicine&#039;s billions they make from an obese, sick populace.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/purify/#comment-50732">Chuck Beatty</a>.</p>
<p>Chuck, most of Mercola&#8217;s articles are real quackery. Stuff like &#8220;take responsibility for your health,&#8221; &#8220;eat healthy food,&#8221; &#8220;exercise,&#8221; &#8220;avoid toxic chemicals,&#8221; you know, the stuff that doesn&#8217;t cost anything and which cuts into Big Medicine&#8217;s billions they make from an obese, sick populace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
