L.R.H. SAID, NOT VERBATIM, HE NEEDED TO BE RELEASED TO ATTEND TO A HIGHER LEVEL, NOT A HUMAN BODY. I WAS IN COLORADO STUDYING ADVANCED CLINICAL COURSES WHEN THIS TOOK PLACE. I VIEW THE PROBLEM IS YOU AND YOUR KIND, STUDENTS OF … IS THAT YOU ARE MIXED UP AS TO THE TRUE PURPOSE… IF… I AM A SEA ORG MEMBER…ORDAINED…I WOULD NOT TELL YOU AS I WOULD DEFINITELY SAY YOU ARE NOT INTRUSTED WITH THAT PARTICULAR KNOWLEDGE. SEA ORG MEMBERS KNOW WHO THEY ARE AND ARE TRUSTED WITH MUCH HIGHER LEVELS THAT MOST CANNOT HANDLE, NO MATTER AT WHAT LEVELS, AND THAT IS ALL THAT MATTERS. I DO HOPE YOU STUDY SCIENTOLOGY MORE AS IT WOULD HELP YOU TO GET THE FACTS. L.R.H. WOULD WANT THAT FOR YOU AND EVERY ABLE PERSON TO BECOME MORE ABLE. THERE IS NO “GLASS CEILING THEORY” IN SCIENTOLOGY ONLY PURE KNOWLEDGE. POSTULATE, MAKE-A-WISH AND SCIENTOLOGY CAN AND DOES HELP! HIP-HIP!!!

Not sure I get your point — you’d think that 21+ years post death would be more than enough time to return.
That no one came back, whether they died last year or 22 years ago, is just more evidence that LRH was just making stuff up. You give over, Jackie – because the CoS’s game is up, but you’re still living in LRH’s imagination. AND paying rent.

Look in the thread above – I counted 3 that may have passed 21 years or longer ago – your question for me was had I included LRH and my former husband in that count

I’m sorry for your loss. Very similar story here except for the level of training. 22 years since my mom died and she’s not come back. She joked that she’d show up on my doorstep one day. Nope.

What fact are you trying to keep straight? I am happy he is alive. Where did I say he was not?

Seriously? You could only count 3.

Did that include Hubbard and your former husband?

Particularly for aging members, it seems like we hear about the supposed importance of moving up the “bridge” so as to “come back in better shape” – but I’d think that would get increasingly hard to push.

And what could be more of a barrier to “dissemination” and “expansion” than having a fundamental claim or theory of a supposed “science,” that is testable over the passage of time and yet is failing to prove true?

Good one!😎😂