Thanks Jane! I looked up a clip of “Can We Ever Be Friends” on youtube after watching the new years event video. The same loudness. The same creepiness. The same over-stressing of every syllable. I hope you told him his voiceovers were indeed weird and creepy.

remember the old “Can We Ever Be Friends” cassette? It had the weird creepy voice on it that made you cringe and not want to give it to anyone, much less your family? That voice is Jeff Pomeranz. I spoke to him about it years ago and he said that each line of that cassette was “CSed” or “Coached” by LRH himself with notes of what tone level each line was to be done in. Also he was to do some of it in a monotone voice and then punch up some words loudly in it, and some words at the end of the line. He did it that way cuz he was instructed to do it that way. And my guess is that is the same with the new voiceovers he is doing for the church. Maybe it is hypnotic and they think it will lay in hypnotic phrases like an implant or something.

Its a bit of an odd colour too. A touch of the Donald Trump toupee look I think.

Thanks Lise, good story. I read it, after I fully woke up in June last year. Sorry about the cram I wrote on you a few years ago. For what I can remember I think it was about objectives on one of your pcs when you were C/sing in Bris org. It was mostly likely Miscaviage’s squirrel tech i was going by. You weren’t happy that I remember . So who’s this mystery person?

Aquamarine – Nice comm cycle with “Rich.” Part of the equation (puzzle) is that we do trust, and when we see that some results are correct, we tend to put our trust – and our hope – in the expectation that all other results will be correct. The key element in all this is knowledge. As one gains knowledge, that comes to replace trust and hope. LRH explains this very, very well in the Student Hat lectures (Study Tapes) with his example about gaining sufficient data and understanding which becomes knowledge, to make an evaluation for oneself INDEPENDENTLY of authorities. “Rich” has seen some results, but hasn’t sufficient data or knowledge to form his own conclusions, so he clings to trust and hope. Unfortunately, that trust has been stolen. The solution is what you have begun with Rich – to get him to look (gather data) and understand enough to make his own evaluation.

Aquamarine, you are right. “Old School” is trying to make a point, but fails.

Some wish to dismiss all of Scientology. There premise is either some foggy not-is-ness (DENIAL) to the effect that the world is a fine place, nothing is wrong, people misbehave for reasons not necessitating explanation, there is no reactive mind, and Scientology is a “scam made up by some deluded and greedy science-fiction writer.”

The Scientologist’s premise is (and this is LOGIC): for every effect there must be a knowable cause, the world has problems which cry for resolution, man behaves irrationally due to the presence of a reactive mind, there is truth and something to know about life, and Scientology is the study of that – a truly ground-breaking body of knowledge..

To critics, all one need say is, “Your shoes are dirty, and you are tracking mud.” As someone else pointed out, the critics presume to tell ME a) what I have seen, b) what my experience has been, c) that I am deluded, and d) that Scientology is a “worthless scam.” Yet these critics have nothing to offer. Nothing. No solution. There is only flat out denial in their parroted repertoire (patter). That is the reactive mind at work, and we as Scientologists are supposed to show infinite compassion and acknowledge and be polite and suffer their worthless garbage? These are the exact same people who brought about the Dark Ages, the Inquisition, Radical Islam, and the Radical Co$. The exact same ones. It is THEIR “world” which does not work, not ours.

NO man living or dead or yet to be born tells me what I have seen, what my experience has been, or what I deduce for myself.

One thing that struck me, when he what appeared to be tripping over his words a little earlier, that something he took (Booze, Uppers, etc.) might have worn off, or yet another lie told (O/Ws kicking in … how much BS can you pawn off in a single sitting before it starts to hit you hard?) was missed bigtime and he had to rush off. Already a minute before he said Good Night something was off, it seemed he wasn’t in PT anymore. The 30-year long DM era is coming to an end. Already the media is challenging claims made by DM that a particular Irish Radio station was also involved with a supposed Dublin dissemination campaign. He’s done, just hasn’t cogged on it yet.

Thanks! Very interesting