Comments on: Scientology Hubbard Hype

By: cindy

cindy — Tue, 21 Apr 2015 00:00:15 +0000

In reply to cindy. Yep, Aqua, they are trying to get us declared SP's back in the boat. McCarran, you asked me a Q but there was no reply button to reply, so I hope you get this. Yes I was declared and now they are mailing to me which shows how desperate the church is to counter the bad pr from the movie.

By: Valhalkarie

Valhalkarie — Sat, 18 Apr 2015 13:18:13 +0000

In reply to Chee Chalker. Omg really!!! Wow

By: Valhalkarie

Valhalkarie — Sat, 18 Apr 2015 13:15:26 +0000

This is the crap that keeps ppl in the cult questioning truth and abuse rationalizing there stagnant idiotic rationalizations, the city should have had nothing to do with this B.S. It literally gave DM another BS claim for his crazy circus get togethers. They should be ashamed. Really what has s scientology and its cherch done for skid row and the likes? Do they feed anyone? Pack lunches? Hand out smokes to addicts? They do nothing!!!! UN real!

By: Len Zinberg

Len Zinberg — Sat, 18 Apr 2015 11:50:27 +0000

I read the Scientology PR piece three times in search of an articulation of Hubbard’s actual accomplishment, and, unsurprisingly, there is none. In other words, this Proclamation recognizes a non-event that occurred 65 years ago! This is PR that is totally devoid of substance, marketed to people with little or no ability to engage in critical thinking. Scientologists, in other words.
Doubtless, Mayor Garcetti has seen “Going Clear”, as have other elected officials, and they now wish they hadn’t been such willing “tools.”

By: 1984

1984 — Sat, 18 Apr 2015 05:22:34 +0000

In reply to 1984. Mike, As for hitting the RCS, logical focus on illegal / immoral issues should suffice. Ad hominem attacks will not go far and they only dig the instigator deeper in the mud. Steve, I have no idea what you mean by "foolproof".

By: Rick Mycroft

Rick Mycroft — Sat, 18 Apr 2015 05:03:30 +0000

In reply to nomnom. Hopefully they won't forge more LAPD approvals. The Way To More Questions August 18, 2005, Carl Kozlowski, Pasadena Weekly

By: Rick Mycroft

Rick Mycroft — Sat, 18 Apr 2015 04:58:42 +0000

In reply to Sir Upticious. He didn't work for the LAPD, he was employed by the Metropolitan Detective Agency, a private security company. All private security guards needed one of those cards at the time.

By: Foolproof

Foolproof — Sat, 18 Apr 2015 04:37:26 +0000

In reply to 1984.

Steve, no Foolproof is not 1984. There is only one Foolproof – and that is me (well, as far as I know). I am sure 1984 will confirm that. Mike would confirm that by his observance of email addresses as well (well, as far as I know). There are (or were in my case) others who post on here that also disagree with some people’s statements. I don’t post on here anymore and am just clarifying this issue.

By: Al Brown

Al Brown — Sat, 18 Apr 2015 03:51:43 +0000

In reply to The Oracle. :)

By: FOTF2012

FOTF2012 — Sat, 18 Apr 2015 02:46:23 +0000

Here are the requirements to become a special officer in LA currently. Not very rigorous. May have been even more lax in the past.

http://www.lapdonline.org/police_commission/content_basic_view/9141