<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: They Are Completing 10,000 On Solo NOTs in 2015	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/they-are-completing-10000-on-solo-nots-in-2015/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/they-are-completing-10000-on-solo-nots-in-2015/</link>
	<description>Something Can Be Done About It</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 22:04:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark Marco		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/they-are-completing-10000-on-solo-nots-in-2015/#comment-74829</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Marco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 22:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=21541#comment-74829</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I love this blog.
I&#039;ve learned so much about how to think...
-the danger is in believing,
and how to act.
Here we have a church which claims to be the absolute authority, the path to personal freedom.
Well, right there, the church is destined to ultimately be shipwrecked.
Of course the premise is wrong, at least seriously flawed, and LRH knew he better have some structure of defense or else destiny would happen sooner than later, the ending being like that of Rome.
And in this blog we don&#039;t claim blame or victimhood.
We expose the truth, best as we can figure it out.
And that is a noble cause, being out to do the right thing, no matter what is what, just what is the right thing to do?
Let it be known, the Church of Scientology is falling on its own sword. It has become a band of lawyers, 
lawyers only know lawyer-speak, and the fight is won when the false premise is exposed. 
The church exposes itself, again in the here and now, by using the word legal to support their stand on the moral high-ground. What is the church offering the world? All it has. 
After a half-century of existence, the answer is reduced to a legal argument.

Says a lot.

No one can say what is right for you. Only you have that power, knowingness only you possess. If you recognize wisdom then give the person or that philosophy the appropriate trial, for as long as it works. But, don&#039;t believe. Soon as you do, you are giving yourself away. There is not one human being that is not to some degree brainwashed. Now, I know you know all this stuff. It is good to speak. I love this blog. It is good to be in good company. That&#039;s why I&#039;m here. I saw Mike&#039;s title first, something can be done, indeed. That&#039;s how to act.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this blog.<br />
I&#8217;ve learned so much about how to think&#8230;<br />
-the danger is in believing,<br />
and how to act.<br />
Here we have a church which claims to be the absolute authority, the path to personal freedom.<br />
Well, right there, the church is destined to ultimately be shipwrecked.<br />
Of course the premise is wrong, at least seriously flawed, and LRH knew he better have some structure of defense or else destiny would happen sooner than later, the ending being like that of Rome.<br />
And in this blog we don&#8217;t claim blame or victimhood.<br />
We expose the truth, best as we can figure it out.<br />
And that is a noble cause, being out to do the right thing, no matter what is what, just what is the right thing to do?<br />
Let it be known, the Church of Scientology is falling on its own sword. It has become a band of lawyers,<br />
lawyers only know lawyer-speak, and the fight is won when the false premise is exposed.<br />
The church exposes itself, again in the here and now, by using the word legal to support their stand on the moral high-ground. What is the church offering the world? All it has.<br />
After a half-century of existence, the answer is reduced to a legal argument.</p>
<p>Says a lot.</p>
<p>No one can say what is right for you. Only you have that power, knowingness only you possess. If you recognize wisdom then give the person or that philosophy the appropriate trial, for as long as it works. But, don&#8217;t believe. Soon as you do, you are giving yourself away. There is not one human being that is not to some degree brainwashed. Now, I know you know all this stuff. It is good to speak. I love this blog. It is good to be in good company. That&#8217;s why I&#8217;m here. I saw Mike&#8217;s title first, something can be done, indeed. That&#8217;s how to act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chuck Beatty		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/they-are-completing-10000-on-solo-nots-in-2015/#comment-74755</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuck Beatty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=21541#comment-74755</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/they-are-completing-10000-on-solo-nots-in-2015/#comment-74729&quot;&gt;Marc Headley&lt;/a&gt;.

There is no Santa Claus, there are no OTs.

Scientology&#039;s really just a long drawn out Santa Claus/Caspar the Ghost sales operation, to adults.

Once you see there&#039;s no Santa Claus, and that the Santa Claus believers are doing a group dream number, you are infinitely more powerful than the Santa Claus believers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/they-are-completing-10000-on-solo-nots-in-2015/#comment-74729">Marc Headley</a>.</p>
<p>There is no Santa Claus, there are no OTs.</p>
<p>Scientology&#8217;s really just a long drawn out Santa Claus/Caspar the Ghost sales operation, to adults.</p>
<p>Once you see there&#8217;s no Santa Claus, and that the Santa Claus believers are doing a group dream number, you are infinitely more powerful than the Santa Claus believers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chuck Beatty		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/they-are-completing-10000-on-solo-nots-in-2015/#comment-74754</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuck Beatty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=21541#comment-74754</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not so sure!

If we had accurate statistics for L. Ron Hubbard&#039;s 1958-59 Scientology compared to today, I have the inkling that the hype back then in Hubbard&#039;s day, was way off ratio compared to the then reality of membership of Scientology compared to today&#039;s hype that today&#039;s Scientology is big and reaching tipping point theta injection capacity to start spinning earth in a theta direction.   (I personally don&#039;t believe Scientology has any impact, other than to the degree that Janet Reitman says it has in her book which I would have thought Scientologists would at least read her book and appreciate what praise she gave and allowed Scientologists.)

There&#039;s probably more statistical backing behind today&#039;s dismal small Scientology community showing that it at least is bigger than the 1958-59 worldwide total of Scientology, really, so today&#039;s hype is slightly more realistic compared to Hubbard&#039;s 58-59 type at least.


It just gets old, the hype gets old.   Older members get saturated with it, new members can&#039;t even understand the hype, why hype when it&#039;s so untrue.   

All through Scientology history the hype just gets old to those that have learned to accept it, and it offends newbies.

But LRH clearly says &quot;....not enough hype.....&quot; in one of the ASI advices to the early 1980s ASI staff responsible for promoting either BE or ME or another one of LRH&#039;s properties.

Never enough hype.

Hype is LRH policy, it&#039;s timeless tech.

Getting used to the hype, is an acquired Scientology piece of timeless tech people have just got to put up with.   

The Scientology bigger problem, really, is their KSW failure to deliver real OT people.   There&#039;s no OTs.  And that&#039;s not their fault, it&#039;s the problem that there are no OT superpeople to be made since the theory behind Scientology cannot produce superpeople.    People can&#039;t become superpeople who can fly out of their heads like LRH supposed people could like in his old &quot;Be 3 feet back of your head&quot; process and then the &quot;Grand Tour&quot; process of Creation of Human Ability book that supposedly directs a person to &quot;go to the surface of the Moon&quot;   etc.    It can&#039;t be done, other than in a person&#039;s imagination.   

If Scientology could produce some real OTs who could exteriorize at will and do things as exteriorized beings, for real, like Caspar the Ghost, then the world would be transformed already, we&#039;d have real OTs, we&#039;d have a whole different civilization already.   

We don&#039;t.

Scientology fails.   LRH admitted failure, people need to re-read, or read in the first place, Lawrence Wright&#039;s &quot;Going Clear....&quot; final pages where LRH admitted failure to his close friend at the end of LRH&#039;s life.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not so sure!</p>
<p>If we had accurate statistics for L. Ron Hubbard&#8217;s 1958-59 Scientology compared to today, I have the inkling that the hype back then in Hubbard&#8217;s day, was way off ratio compared to the then reality of membership of Scientology compared to today&#8217;s hype that today&#8217;s Scientology is big and reaching tipping point theta injection capacity to start spinning earth in a theta direction.   (I personally don&#8217;t believe Scientology has any impact, other than to the degree that Janet Reitman says it has in her book which I would have thought Scientologists would at least read her book and appreciate what praise she gave and allowed Scientologists.)</p>
<p>There&#8217;s probably more statistical backing behind today&#8217;s dismal small Scientology community showing that it at least is bigger than the 1958-59 worldwide total of Scientology, really, so today&#8217;s hype is slightly more realistic compared to Hubbard&#8217;s 58-59 type at least.</p>
<p>It just gets old, the hype gets old.   Older members get saturated with it, new members can&#8217;t even understand the hype, why hype when it&#8217;s so untrue.   </p>
<p>All through Scientology history the hype just gets old to those that have learned to accept it, and it offends newbies.</p>
<p>But LRH clearly says &#8220;&#8230;.not enough hype&#8230;..&#8221; in one of the ASI advices to the early 1980s ASI staff responsible for promoting either BE or ME or another one of LRH&#8217;s properties.</p>
<p>Never enough hype.</p>
<p>Hype is LRH policy, it&#8217;s timeless tech.</p>
<p>Getting used to the hype, is an acquired Scientology piece of timeless tech people have just got to put up with.   </p>
<p>The Scientology bigger problem, really, is their KSW failure to deliver real OT people.   There&#8217;s no OTs.  And that&#8217;s not their fault, it&#8217;s the problem that there are no OT superpeople to be made since the theory behind Scientology cannot produce superpeople.    People can&#8217;t become superpeople who can fly out of their heads like LRH supposed people could like in his old &#8220;Be 3 feet back of your head&#8221; process and then the &#8220;Grand Tour&#8221; process of Creation of Human Ability book that supposedly directs a person to &#8220;go to the surface of the Moon&#8221;   etc.    It can&#8217;t be done, other than in a person&#8217;s imagination.   </p>
<p>If Scientology could produce some real OTs who could exteriorize at will and do things as exteriorized beings, for real, like Caspar the Ghost, then the world would be transformed already, we&#8217;d have real OTs, we&#8217;d have a whole different civilization already.   </p>
<p>We don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Scientology fails.   LRH admitted failure, people need to re-read, or read in the first place, Lawrence Wright&#8217;s &#8220;Going Clear&#8230;.&#8221; final pages where LRH admitted failure to his close friend at the end of LRH&#8217;s life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark Marco		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/they-are-completing-10000-on-solo-nots-in-2015/#comment-74733</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Marco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 03:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=21541#comment-74733</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/they-are-completing-10000-on-solo-nots-in-2015/#comment-74607&quot;&gt;overrunincalif&lt;/a&gt;.

hey, that&#039;s my girl!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/they-are-completing-10000-on-solo-nots-in-2015/#comment-74607">overrunincalif</a>.</p>
<p>hey, that&#8217;s my girl!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Marc Headley		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/they-are-completing-10000-on-solo-nots-in-2015/#comment-74729</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marc Headley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 02:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=21541#comment-74729</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s see if 6700 OT VII&#039;s can all combine their powers and stop one single film from playing at Sundance. None of them have 1/1000th the power as one single SP. This has been proven time and time again.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see if 6700 OT VII&#8217;s can all combine their powers and stop one single film from playing at Sundance. None of them have 1/1000th the power as one single SP. This has been proven time and time again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JennyAtLAX		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/they-are-completing-10000-on-solo-nots-in-2015/#comment-74728</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JennyAtLAX]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 02:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=21541#comment-74728</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/they-are-completing-10000-on-solo-nots-in-2015/#comment-74598&quot;&gt;Indie Mindie&lt;/a&gt;.

A message for Indie Mindie from the &quot;Urban Dictionary&quot;:

&quot;Schooled:

&quot;Being taught the proper way to perform an action, via extreme ownage and embarrasment. This requires the schooler, who is always of such a high level of skill that the schoolee has no chance of saving his reputation, to utterly dominate and show no remorse. If remorse is shown, it is done in a cool and laid-back way, as in to say &#039;You&#039;re not even worth the effort of my pinkie finger,&#039; which. ironically. is just as brutal as an all-out ownage. 

&quot;If you ever find yourself being schooled, it is wise to not bitch about it. Doing so makes you look like a tool.&quot;

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=schooled]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/they-are-completing-10000-on-solo-nots-in-2015/#comment-74598">Indie Mindie</a>.</p>
<p>A message for Indie Mindie from the &#8220;Urban Dictionary&#8221;:</p>
<p>&#8220;Schooled:</p>
<p>&#8220;Being taught the proper way to perform an action, via extreme ownage and embarrasment. This requires the schooler, who is always of such a high level of skill that the schoolee has no chance of saving his reputation, to utterly dominate and show no remorse. If remorse is shown, it is done in a cool and laid-back way, as in to say &#8216;You&#8217;re not even worth the effort of my pinkie finger,&#8217; which. ironically. is just as brutal as an all-out ownage. </p>
<p>&#8220;If you ever find yourself being schooled, it is wise to not bitch about it. Doing so makes you look like a tool.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=schooled" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=schooled</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: WhiteStar		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/they-are-completing-10000-on-solo-nots-in-2015/#comment-74727</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WhiteStar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 01:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=21541#comment-74727</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/they-are-completing-10000-on-solo-nots-in-2015/#comment-74598&quot;&gt;Indie Mindie&lt;/a&gt;.

like cockroaches coming into the light so is OSA&#039;s desperation.

the facade is so cracked and chipped, half hanged and dangling, the only thing left is for the body to drop.

yes it is true, scientology is clearing the planet......of scientology.

&quot;have fun storming the castle&quot;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/they-are-completing-10000-on-solo-nots-in-2015/#comment-74598">Indie Mindie</a>.</p>
<p>like cockroaches coming into the light so is OSA&#8217;s desperation.</p>
<p>the facade is so cracked and chipped, half hanged and dangling, the only thing left is for the body to drop.</p>
<p>yes it is true, scientology is clearing the planet&#8230;&#8230;of scientology.</p>
<p>&#8220;have fun storming the castle&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: cindy		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/they-are-completing-10000-on-solo-nots-in-2015/#comment-74726</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cindy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 01:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=21541#comment-74726</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/they-are-completing-10000-on-solo-nots-in-2015/#comment-74705&quot;&gt;Joe Pendleton&lt;/a&gt;.

Joe, I know Janet Bertinot, and that is the best thing that could have happened to you to have her disconnect from you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/they-are-completing-10000-on-solo-nots-in-2015/#comment-74705">Joe Pendleton</a>.</p>
<p>Joe, I know Janet Bertinot, and that is the best thing that could have happened to you to have her disconnect from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jenstnick		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/they-are-completing-10000-on-solo-nots-in-2015/#comment-74725</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jenstnick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 01:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=21541#comment-74725</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/they-are-completing-10000-on-solo-nots-in-2015/#comment-74704&quot;&gt;Cat Daddy&lt;/a&gt;.

And a penchant for sarcasm, which always wins me over.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/they-are-completing-10000-on-solo-nots-in-2015/#comment-74704">Cat Daddy</a>.</p>
<p>And a penchant for sarcasm, which always wins me over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Wirts		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/they-are-completing-10000-on-solo-nots-in-2015/#comment-74724</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wirts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=21541#comment-74724</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/they-are-completing-10000-on-solo-nots-in-2015/#comment-74601&quot;&gt;Mike Rinder&lt;/a&gt;.

Awesome response!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/they-are-completing-10000-on-solo-nots-in-2015/#comment-74601">Mike Rinder</a>.</p>
<p>Awesome response!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
