I have done plenty of posts about the work of Child USA and SOL reform here and on social media. Child USA does press releases all the time and all the information is on the website. What leads you to conclude I “didnt share it?” Is there a specific person or persons I should have shared it with?

Mike, why didn’t you share the info about the suspended statute with the wider community? Victims could have done something Only one lawsuit made it under the wire

Thank you for this statement!
I hope we can hear / see / read the side of the victim at some stage.
Meanwhile still a lot of food for thoughts for me to digest.

You don’t want to accept the truth even when I answer your question — rather stick to what “surely must be true.” Child USA is a think tank, it does not directly represent victims. It’s not a lawfirm. How many cases did Kent’s firm bring based on SOL law changes for Scientology victims? I don’t think any. I am aware of 4 cases they filed for Scn victims total. Are there other lawyers who have? No idea. Do you think there is some mechanism or requirement for lawyers to report information like this? Any yes, Kent’s actions are unconscionable. I have not spoken to him in more than 2 years, though I have spoken to one of the lawyers in his firm who represented Val Haney when her being forced into “arbitration” was being argued. Again, I doubt you care to hear this, and will instead believe what is said by people who don’t know but pretend they do (“this must be the case”) in order to get clicks on their channels.

I don’t have time, to be online, all day.

CHILD USA have done so much to eliminate statute of limitations.
CHILD USA probably do not make public, victims.
An attorney, can be a bad person, and represent people well.

I am asking myself, why you are trying to defame CHILD USA.
Again, I am sure all the videos, have nothing to do with the Aaron Smith Levin scandal.
With kind regards
Kim

I am so tired of the ‘new’ SPTV crew making wild and unfounded accusations against Mike Rinder. I no longer watch but ooccasionally it comes up on my feed. Hang in there Mike.

I just did a quick Google search, just now, and journalists are treating this case, in accordance with the laws these people have to follow. The fact is that Kent was acting wrongly, in one case, and was acting, on his own. He has now excused himself. Everything else is not fact, at this point. Should all these assumptions, be proven right, it would sadden me. I will always support people, who help children. I am sure this has nothing to do with the new Aaron Smith Levin, former girlfriend allegations…
Kind regards
Kim

Surely if CHILD USA has done so much to eliminate statute of limitations (albeit temporarily) they’d have some idea of whether any scientology-related lawsuits have been brought as a result? Particularly if one of the board members was representing quite a few of them (poorly)?

The lawyer was never my friend, though I did try to assist the other lawyers in his firm in their litigation against scientology. I did not refer or send my friend to him. I did not know of the allegations against him until VERY recently — long after he was no longer representing my friend. Anyone saying otherwise is making up “facts” to forward some agenda.

Kim check out the lawyer Rinder sent his friend to. As yet Mike hasn’t spoken on this issue however I’m waiting to see where he stands on this since the lawyer and the victim are both his friends.
Child USA is a great organization and mike can help assure they aren’t tainted by this lawyer a recently removed board member btw.