DM probably doesn’t divorce Shelley because there would be a looking into assets, a listing of ALL money and assets to be divided up in a divorce. DM doesn’t want the world to know how many millions he has socked away all of it tax free.

Actually though Hubbard’s methods are mental, and there’s no such thing as a “rock slam” the verdict in actual science is still out as to plants feeling pain or not. Debate in biology circles is hot!

https://science.howstuffworks.com/life/botany/plants-feel-pain.htm

Different thought, does anyone think maybe he (mis)heard “Tweedy” https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/tweedy and created theetie weetie off of that? I’m going to ask a Pom Linguist friend and if he has an answer of note post it back here at some later date but am spitballing here …

I thought it was obviously satire and was onto it as soon as it came to your sister. It was just TOO exact to the LRH quote, that’s why, and it clued me in. I’m a never in, but I’ve been reading Tony Ortega and Mike’s blogs for a bunch of years now, and have read every ex’s book that I can find. I’ve also been studying cults on my own since I was 17, right around the time that EST was becoming a big deal in California. My late husband occasionally worked in the sound truck for EST events back in the 80s, but never got seduced into it. He heard the same crap from Erhard over and over and over again out in the sound truck, and it inoculated him. I had friends who fell into it, whose personalities I watched change for much the worse as they were brainwashed, and I think that helped inoculate me against cults in general.

Congrats on the very clever satire from a never in who got it. Well done.

Hi: Is Mike and his family on a Christmas break because I Have not received anything after this blog. Just asking, Miss the blogs but he and his family certainly do deserve some time off. Does anyone know? Happy Holidays toall.

It is heart breaking to hear about such a good person like Yvonne who thought she was helping people being put down for her joy and ultimately dying from the abuse. This cult is just sick, sick, sick. How sad for the people left in. It just shows you how screwed up LRH and DM were and are.

Sorry, I just dont have the time (nor the inclination any longer) to read your endless responses to everything. You are going to find a lot of your comments are just trashed. You are the only I have to explain this to. The other people who have comments trashed never bring it up. You routinely submit: “It’s not fair, why did you delete this comment?”.

So, now I have explained it to you. I’m tired of spending time reading this stuff.

Not really going to allow many comments to sent your way either. I will just generally trash them too.

What do you think a comment like the above accomplishes? Convinces Wynski he is wrong? Makes you look good? Convinces people that true believers in the tech might have a point?

Obviously you think it does something of value. I disagree and have given you plenty of opportunity.

I admit some of this is my reaction to Marildi’s effort to trash Ortega, and I don’t claim to be Clear (or OT) — though I have dozens of certs and success stories proving that I am — so I have irrational reactions sometimes.

Ah well, if you don’t like it, start your own blog and you can do anything you like there.

But Wyn, didn’t you realize that Grade IV is not that you won’t make anyone wrong anymore (like you do – haha!) or when they are wrong (like you are – another haha!), it’s a bit more subtle than that. After all, if a stupid schoolboy (who just happens to be called Wynski – funny that!) gets his times table wrong and the teacher says “no, no, Wynski, you stupid dolt, 2 x 2 does not equal 5, didn’t you do your Basic Study Manual in the Org?”, doesn’t mean the teacher has a Ser Fac about the times table or whatever. Does it now? And also of course a real Clear would be able to use a Ser Fac knowingly and jokingly – another haha! (That will confuse you even more!) But read the HCOBs and listen to the tapes on the subject. That should clear things up now.

You also don’t have to get all defensive and ponder “what will that nasty Foolproof reply to this and how can I counter it to stop him doing so (as he is a very crafty dude)?” – and thus try and predict my replies either – just let it flow! You can be right! Well, now and then anyway! And not very often either. Haha!

p.s. as to my Grade 0 – well, I seem to be freely communicating with all sorts and all subjects here, and even without spontaneously combusting!

It’s an impossible argument Foolproof.

My take is you are arguing for the sequential infallibility of Ron’s bridge; which you are.

And I am arguing that the 100 percent standard is delusional; no matter the sequence

And your argument is a logical fallacy as there are countless ex Scientologists who did it all the “correct” way and have the same view as me.

One would have to agree that Scientology is 100 percent standard to believe what you believe.

You see a real oasis out in the desert and I see the specter of make believe.

And possibly you may be coming back to this site, that disagrees with you most of the time, because somewhere inside yourself you know that something is not right.

You know you are not changing anyone’s views yet you keep coming back here. I’m glad you are. Keep coming back and sharing you’re views. You are welcome here in this land of anti-Scientologists.

Mike, the “anti Scientologist” allows all dissent.

Marty, the Scientologist, allows no dissent.

Therein lies the puzzle.

The ones who claim superiority in communication are the worst at it.

And those that are trying to protect the world from Hubbard’s madness are allowing all views.

COGNITIVE DISSONANCE AT ITS BEST.

have a good day Foolproof and Happy Holidays?

Right Foolproof. Like you who didn’t get the ability gained for Grade 0 and thus “bypassed” your case on every subsequent level including all OT levels you did.

And then there is Grade IV, making others wrong. You CERTAINLY never finished that one either.

And NO! This isn’t a pot/kettle situation as I don’t claim that scamology fixes any of these things.

LMAO!

No Yawn, it’s all quite straightforward. All those “exceptions” situations you imply above do actually exist in the real universe, as you must really know from having worked in Tech all those years. I didn’t find 1 “exception” that was routed to me in Qual that didn’t actually exist – you asked the person and he/she confirmed it. Life is complex, and fortunately Hubbard spotted all the “complexities” for us – saved a lot of guess-work.