Comments on: Cognitive Dissonance

By: Jim

Jim — Wed, 07 Jan 2015 11:52:57 +0000

In reply to thegman77. That was from Rocky III, which is even better.

By: Gus Cox

Gus Cox — Wed, 07 Jan 2015 03:43:26 +0000

Yeah, Oy with the “Planetary Dissemination” already.

But you know it just occurred to me (i.e. “I just had a cognition!!!”) that Scientology has already achieved planetary dissemination. I’d bet that if you went to any mall or market in the world and asked random passersby these three questions,

Have you ever heard of Scientology?
Have you ever heard of Dianetics?
Have you ever heard of L. Ron Hubbard?

they would run away from you screaming, and probably on the first question.

I’d guess that a majority of people, at least in the First World, have heard of it. Planetary Dissemination achieved.

Unfortunately for the Planetary Dissemination Unit, such widespread name recognition makes it impossible for Scientology to do anything but fail because the brand is so hopelessly toxic.

Yo, Miscavige: Better call Superfund.

By: Friend

Friend — Tue, 06 Jan 2015 17:43:31 +0000

In reply to Michael Mallen. There is about 7.000.000.000 x 500.000 in it .. you have only to do it ..

By: Friend

Friend — Tue, 06 Jan 2015 17:39:54 +0000

In reply to pedrofcuk. What is the reactive mind really. Yeah, you can start with it .. then you have one .. if you have never start with it you have none. How do you start with it?

By: Michael Mallen

Michael Mallen — Tue, 06 Jan 2015 16:58:54 +0000

In retrospect, this was probably the beginning of my cognitive dissonance. Might not have the exact wording so please correct me if I’m wrong.

“No one could possibly be serious and win in this universe.” PDC Lecture 1952

“This is a deadly serious activity.” KSW 1965

By: Michael Mallen

Michael Mallen — Tue, 06 Jan 2015 16:21:06 +0000

In reply to Mike Leopold. Dave logic: I'm your savior, so change your behavior.

By: pedrofcuk

pedrofcuk — Tue, 06 Jan 2015 15:55:03 +0000

Is it ok to point out that when they do go clear they realise that they haven’t got the reactive mind that they never had to start with? Or is that just too technical?

By: Michael Mallen

Michael Mallen — Tue, 06 Jan 2015 15:50:16 +0000

In reply to Friend. Where's the money in that?

By: Michael Mallen

Michael Mallen — Tue, 06 Jan 2015 15:44:39 +0000

In reply to Thomas Weeks. The time frame of birth bringing death.

By: Friend

Friend — Tue, 06 Jan 2015 11:05:39 +0000

When you cognited on Clear .. than you are Clear. It is not possible to cancel that. I have seen lot of people who became declared as Clear .. but were surely not. What is a Clear? LRH describes it all to time, but it is true that no one ever reached the Book One definitions .. there is nobody who could ever demonstrate that objectively. The point which I will make is, that when you run auditing .. you will adeqately find out one day that you mock-up everything .. if you check that, and know that for yourself .. you will get a jump into taking more responsibility to others .. you will stop to blame others for your own traumas .. it means you can now look to the whole scenario which exist now .. not longer influenced from or by cognitive dissonance ..

If you have checked that .. you have no liability to do it again. It is impossible. But if you do not have such a cognition .. you will run only another cognitive dissonance against others and the world .. which means you mock up still things which are not really there .. you are not cleared about .. you hold on your subjective realities not the objectives .. there is still a continuous pressed seven in your thinking .. which means that you are not cause over your own thinking .. so you can go for two or three or four Clear declares, but only when the person has never the right cognition about .. but if a person had the right cognition .. it is totally impossible to cancel that .. I mean, if you got it, you got .. it is not possible to redo that .. nobody can handle a nothingness as a somethingness .. not with a Clear ..

It is the same with Objectives. You cannot redo them when you had the basic cognition about. It means, when you can give the time span of present time you are really in present time orientated .. you cannot win a cognition again .. if you had it, you had it ..