Yeah, right, Bill. scientology’s ‘ethics’ have no provision for the accused being innocent of the charges, so no one can actually investigate and find the truth of the matter.

Mike, it’s also got no taint of Justice in it, either. Heaven forfend that the accused might be able to get off without punishment and humiliation.

AGP: it makes me embarrassed to be an *American* when they can “game” the system so easily. particularly when it’s scientology against an ex-member who fully and freely renounces her previous participation in the organization, so should be FREE of its draconian rules.

Wryturman,
thanks for saying that all so succinctly.

ISNOINews, I can’t see HOW scn and NOI maintain their alliance. They’re so diametrically opposed worldviews, each considering the other’s members quite a bit below human. Meanwhile, only a scientologist organization would have any use for the Staff Status courses, SS0 or SS I.

LDW, if there were real justice in the world and if scientology COULD change, you might be right, but if the truth of it were established in one case, every other similar case would have to be argued as effectively AND the judge just as immune to scn’s bullying ways.

Rip, I was only an observer most times, but was on one committee. In each case, the committee was “strongly encouraged” to find that the defendants were guilty as charged since they wouldn’t be charged if they weren’t guilty of the charges abd worse. Tere was no possible defense, in other words.