Without reading your links, I would say Scientology has probably more acronyms, most of which I know. I hope you are not an “acronyist” or there is some sort of anti-acronyism going on?

I have experienced the same. Earlier, there was some (wordpress?) feature to enlarge the images comfortably to browser window size and to flip through them with arrow buttons. It’s probably been lost when re-using older RB posts.

Yes, it has NOTHING to do with “withholds”.

Katherine, Foolproof is pulling your leg.

That’s right! She says the character is being too effuse in her repeated assertions of love for her dead husband.

I’m trying to work out what, if any, aspects of scientology you apply here, in your written comm? You appeared to agree, at least in part, that perhaps you weren’t setting a good example of a peaceful, spiritually enlightening brand of scientology, yet 1) you persist with these puerile challenges/putdowns, 2) you don’t answer questions, and 3) you disregard key scn teaching. Do you seriously believe you are a good advert for scientology?

Ps. I am still waiting for your “empirical evidence” re http://www.mikerindersblog.org/more-on-past-lives-real-or-imagined/#comment-200928 (my TR3 is exceptional, btw)

I wonder who has MORE “Acronyms”, Scientology or NASA ?

https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?PHPSESSID=7i8gh4ljv97i0a3nvjdvpsbj02&action=dlattach;topic=34802.0;attach=600182;sess=0

https://wikileaks.org/wiki/Draft:Scientology_acronyms

Dave F.

Again, this is nonsense and you have bent the facts to suit your cloth. No one has ever said Hubbard invented the Wheatstone Bridge. But did anyone ever interpret the readings of this particular type of Wheatstone Bridge, producing books and courses etc. as to how it could be used to interpret what goes on in a person’s mind when used by a trained auditor. Where are all these explanations from other sources than Hubbard – they don’t exist do they? Get your facts right before you spout your stuff.

No MORON (aka Foolproof) mwesten is calling YOU out as a hypocrite. Quite correctly too.

Foolproof,

You said, “Because you are criticizing the man and perhaps hoping thereby to denigrate the technology that he invented, which works a treat and helps people. ”

END QUOTE :

If you were referring to the “E-Meter”, which was invented in the 1940’s . . .Hubbard DID NOT invent it . . .

http://skepdic.com/emeter.html

He STOLE the invention and, in 1966, filed a PATENT on it in his own name . . .

https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/E-Meter/hubbard-patent.html

QUOTE : ” According to Hubbard’s son Ronald: “My father obtained the rights to the E-meter in1952 from Volney Mathison in the same manner that he does everything – through fraud and coercion.” END QUOTE:

*More ” Stolen GLory” by LRH !

THIS is what the “E-Meter” REALLY is . . .

https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/E-Meter/biophysics.html

http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/E-Meter/

The truth exposes Hubbard for EVERYTHING he was, and what Scientology CONTINUES to be !

Dave F.