Ok, I’ll see you “up the line.” 🙂

Happy Thanksgiving to you too, and Mike and everybody here.

Thanks M., I just enabled the “notify me…” function, so that should make things much easier for me to stay on top of.

I’m at a bit of a loss here in understanding what the concern is over continuing a discussion that is both civil and, imo, of fundamental importance in deconstructing $cn at a foundational level, but I’ll respect Mike’s wishes here.

Let’s continue this discussion as the occasion may arise in relation to future blog topic, shall we? I did my best to spell out two major uncredited sources that Elron misappropriated and folded into $cn as if they his own. I could easily have gone on there to include quite a few more, but that would have made my already TL;DR post even longer. In the meantime, I’ll re-work my argument and see if I can make it more concise and easily understandable.

Best wishes to all on this Thanksgiving Day

HF, we obviously need to end off on this topic, but for future reference you should request email notifications so that you can easily see when you get a reply to a comment and exactly what it was in reply to. In the above comment, you wrote “in response to your 11/23, 2:56 pm post asking me about where I’d spelled out exactly which foundational concepts…” – but that was not what I asked, and this is a continuation of confusion on your part.

You probably know how to get notifications, but in case you don’t, just click on the little box where it says “Notify me of new comments via email,” which is right below where you type in your comment. Do this when you post your first comment on a thread.

Cheers.

Sorry, seemed like an important topic worth going into. I wasn’t taking Marildi’s comments as offensive, insincere or off-topic, so…

please feel free to point out to me if I’ve failed to respond to a comment

Please don’t. If you guys want to carry on an extended discussion I will be happy to give each of you the other’s email address.

This blog format for ongoing discussion makes it very hard to keep track of ongoing conversations, so, like I said before, please feel free to point out to me if I’ve failed to respond to a comment or counter-argument that you’d made to one of my posts.

Btw, if you don’t mind my asking, are you still active as an indie auditor and do you continue to solo audit on the OT levels?

Some of your readers might care about such things, Mike – especially if they are on the fence about Hubbard and the CoS but still think the tech does a lot of good. As I’ve said, I think this kind of discussion contributes to your cause too, as it shows that not everybody outside of the church completely disses LRH and the tech.

In any case, sorry to have annoyed you, and I appreciate you allowing as much as you did.

Please just end this back and forth. I don’t want to have to read it any more.

Who cares? Can you get into present time and end this back and forth that nobody in the world could care less about?

HP, in that post of 11/21 at 2:34, there is nothing on the subject of what you called LRH’s “misappropriation of most of the crucial foundational constructs” – which was what I was specifically talking about in my comment above and even quoted you on at the beginning of it.

So far at least, neither have you responded to my own reply to you, in response to another comment you made regarding LRH’s so-called “misappropriation” having to do with the “carrier wave” and “force” of intention: http://www.mikerindersblog.org/intention/#comment-151695