1969 why thetans mock up. it is findable. READ IT.

Thank you, John Smith. Just a friendly reminder to those who are STILL HOPING…
Sadly, you’ll die HOPING!

… Clear …: You’ll have powers and be free of dead aliens soon after this
OT I: *Now* you’re an OT
OT II: *Now* you’re an OT
OT III: *Now* you’re an OT— also aliens
OT IV: *Now* you’re an OT
OT V: *Now* you’re an OT
OT VI: *Now* you’re an OT
OT VII: *Now* you’re an OT
OT VIII: *Now* you’re an OT—you’re at the end rn but get others into this cult so we can take more ~~$~~aliens out
OT IX: *Now* you’re an OT
OT X: *Now* you’re an OT
OT XI: *Now* you’re an OT

Brian, thanks as always for sharing your thoughts.

I run across things like Mayo’s account, and then I start to wonder. But then I look back at the Hubbard of the Affirmations, and how he behaved towards his wife and child and business partners a few years after, and see a straight line from the unhinged abuse tyrant of 1950 to the unhinged abusive tyrant of 1970. If he wasn’t somehow schizophrenic, then he was very good at hiding his dark side at times. Perhaps like a good sociopath, he “groomed” Mayo when it served him to do so at first, and what Mayo saw later was not a change but a reveal. You are right that Hubbard is a never ending puzzle, I would be hard pressed to say with any certainty that my theory about this aspect is really any better than yours.

Thinking as I write, I could concede that maybe Hubbard’s auditing combined with a period when things mostly went his way from the mid 50s through the early 60s could have mellowed him out, but that when conditions and circumstances changed he started to regress. In that context it would indeed make sense that perhaps overrunning some things, and taking auditing to extremes like going after endless BTs, he drove himself insane.

I wish we could hash this out a bit more thoroughly, but it’s a complex enough subject that it would be hard to do outside of a real conversation.

Also, since our kind and amazingly diligent proprietor Mike is going to be busy with his other good works, I’m going to try to be more economical in my comments and to avoid extended exchanges.

Great questions Peace Maker. The man is a never ending puzzle.

I think he felt he was doing good in the beginning. Mayo says that. Mayo saw him change.

My view is that Ron’s problem were:

Immorality
Always looking in the past for answers.
Bowing to no common standard of decency

His desire for liberation and freedom was real, in my view.

But because he led an immoral life and followed the mental pide piper of the emeter; he drove himself insane.

His life of deception slowly eroded his well being.

His last OT legacy was wishing for suicide to free BTs after created OT8.

This last sentence represents the end result of the philosophies Ron lived.

This is the state that auditing BTs brought Ron to.

Brian, I wanted to throw out a couple of ideas in case they were of interest or use. Hubbard’s seemingly sincere benevolence at times, is one of the things that I struggled to understand.

I think the best and most comprehensive explanation is that his benevolent and humanitarian utterances and writings, were just cynical “gimmicks” that he employed to attract more followers, and to keep up an acceptable public image.

It’s also possible that he was truly schizophrenic to at least some extent, a real Jekyll and Hyde. If so, the dark side would be clearly the one that predominated, perhaps because that was the one that he fed.

Hubbard has acknowledged using automatic writing, and it’s possible that is the source of some of this sort of work, his “channeling” an unconscious goodness that, once again, he suppressed otherwise.

The other thing I think we tend to forget about, is all the ghost writers, co-authors, collaborators and contributors who he used, and after having given some minor acknowledgement early on, whose work he took full credit for. Perhaps he didn’t even write the things that conflict with the evidence about how he actually lived his life and treated others.

Brian, I was thinking this might be fodder for a piece. Let me share a couple of other thoughts, as briefly as I can.

I think that Hubbard thought that with Crowley and other esoteric works, typically as he thought of everything that had come before, that he was the one who had uncovered the real, specific truth underlying conceptions that were representative or allegorical. Though if Nibs was right, Hubbard still thought that Crowley was so close to the truth, and had such a useful methodology, that his works were still good training material.

It also seems to me that Scientology can itself be seen as an occult system of levels and initiations, with different levels of knowledge – and powers – to be attained, and perhaps a truly secret inner truth at the highest levels. So, typically, Hubbard seems to have believed, and practiced, differently than he taught others; and, similarly, I don’t think we can know what Miscavige believes or practices.

Plus, I’m starting to think that Scientology has to be viewed in terms of a hierarchy, not only with Hubbard’s homo novis above “wogs,” but with non-clear members and staff (including Sea Org) as novices in between them, and then OTs in several levels above, and finally at the top something like “big beings” who are privy to the highest inner sanctum. That is also a hierarch of power and freedom only fully exercised by those at the top, and just as wogs may treat homo novis however suits their ends, the “big beings” can use everyone below them including homo novis as it serves them. And Hubbard’s apparent intense interest in auditing, may not be because he hoped for everyone to rise to full freedom and power, but because he was hoping to cultivate a body of followers of high enough ability to be able to serve his aims, and even take over the wog world for him.

Also, the Jesus as a lover of young boys piece is a typical snide thing of the sort that I suspect that Hubbard picked up from better-read people he socialized with, or from skimming little-known works – as others have cited, and I know from actually having the work, it probably comes from the early 1970s book Secret Gospel of Mark by Morton Smith, the ideas from which might have been circulating after Smith’s supposed late 1950 discovery of a manuscript that includes:

“And straightway, going in where the youth was, he stretched forth his hand and raised him, seizing his hand. But the youth, looking upon him, loved him and began to beseech him that he might be with him.”

That also reflects an obscure but documented controversy or heresy in early Christianity that could have been Hubbard’s source as well, and which shows that the idea that Jesus might have engaged in some of the pederasty common in ancient Greece and Rome is not quite as outrageous as we might view the charge of pedophilia today.

Let me close with a Crowley quote I ran across, that is very KSW: “questions of the Law are to be decided only by appeal to my writings”

I agree George.

On the other hand, I think he may have experienced some real benevolent understandings. I believe Ron wrote What is Greatness as a sales gimmick because he never lived it. And the album was called My Philosophy. He never followed his own philosophy.

But the writing is beautiful by Ron.

I think as he continued solo auditing he continued to collapse his subconscious mind and thus became delusional.

He invoked the dark side. And the dark side did not let him down.

Thanks Peace Maker, yes, the Nibs angle. What he said about his dad was so unbelievable back then that we all thought he was nuts. Then the Armstrong finding of that box of Hubbard’s affirmations.

Hubbard was that guy who intoned those affirmations. The truth of his character was revealed in those affirmations.

Making men his slaves was Ron’s value. It was what he visualized and affirmed. It is what he accomplished.

I am tossing around an essay that is forming in my mind. It will be called

L Ron Hubbard: Messiah or Hypnotic Operator. I will attempt to connect the dots of Hubbard’s interest in power and the selfish dark arts and the present condition of Scientology.

Ron was a being on the dark side.

What kind of mind would define Jesus as a pedophile?
What kind of mind would consider “love and understanding” Marcabian PR?

L Ron Hubbard’s genius was in the area of PR techniques on Scientologists.

Who he was, his tendencies toward immorality, his tendency towards the worship of power instead of goodness puts him in the category of the dark side.

Some may think I’m wacky for even bringing it up. Criticizing the critic is what Ron did to their minds. Part of Ron’s mind control hypnosis.

I hope to illustrate the intentional deception by Ron. But coupled with that intentional deception is Ron’s delusional believe in his own deception.

He was a liar that ended up believing in his own lies. Thus he audited space aliens unto the end of life. Caught in the web of his own falsehoods that were given power and validity by the emeter and his creative imagination.

The lynchpin that holds this madness in place is a lack of understanding of the true nature of Ron’s dark side.

He gravitated to lower Metaphysical energies.

I believe the man is understood by seeing him as a lower astral entity that got a body and sought as much power and money he could muster.

Ron was not just a normal human being. He had demonic qualities:

1) was a liar
2) wrote Fair Game
3) wrote Bolivar
4) betrayed his wife
5) betrayed his “friend” Mayo
6) imprisoned a young boy in a dark chain locker for days
7) drove Quinten to suicide
8) abducted his own child
9) Sarah feared for her life
10) pistol whipped Sarah
11) almost killed Paulette Cooper
12) destroyed the lives of mission holders
13) chose DM as his emissary of retribution

L Ron Hubbard was a madman who dabbled in the darker side of metaphysics. This, I believe, is the essence of the character of L Ron Hubbard.

Tell me……… what kind of mind would equate love and understanding with make believe evil space aliens????? Marcabs.

Ron was a practitioner of the dark arts. His PR machine, protected by fear of punishment, installed in our minds a Messiah, Matreiya.

Ron was not a spiritual man. Ron was not a good person.

“Do as thou wilt is the whole of the law”

This idea IS the true character of L Ron Hubbard. This Crowley commandment is the essence of selfish ego.