<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Removing Arbitraries From The Arbitraries, Again	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/removing-arbitraries-from-the-arbitraries-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/removing-arbitraries-from-the-arbitraries-again/</link>
	<description>Something Can Be Done About It</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 21:21:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: RogerHornaday		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/removing-arbitraries-from-the-arbitraries-again/#comment-114293</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RogerHornaday]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 21:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=26100#comment-114293</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/removing-arbitraries-from-the-arbitraries-again/#comment-114257&quot;&gt;thetaclear&lt;/a&gt;.

Thank you Peter.  As a peace loving man I happily retract everything I&#039;ve said as pure balderdash.   Although I&#039;m not qualified to lecture on the subject of quantum physics, I am able to appreciate the non-existence of a line of demarkation between an object and the perception of that object.  That demarkation exists only in the mind as an idea.  Therefore we may postulate that everything is made of thought.  I will now defy the urge to discuss this fascinating matter any further.  :-)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/removing-arbitraries-from-the-arbitraries-again/#comment-114257">thetaclear</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you Peter.  As a peace loving man I happily retract everything I&#8217;ve said as pure balderdash.   Although I&#8217;m not qualified to lecture on the subject of quantum physics, I am able to appreciate the non-existence of a line of demarkation between an object and the perception of that object.  That demarkation exists only in the mind as an idea.  Therefore we may postulate that everything is made of thought.  I will now defy the urge to discuss this fascinating matter any further.  🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ann B Watson		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/removing-arbitraries-from-the-arbitraries-again/#comment-114289</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ann B Watson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 20:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=26100#comment-114289</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/removing-arbitraries-from-the-arbitraries-again/#comment-114035&quot;&gt;Dawn&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi angryscorpion, Thank you. Good points all around regarding the cob. Always, Ann.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/removing-arbitraries-from-the-arbitraries-again/#comment-114035">Dawn</a>.</p>
<p>Hi angryscorpion, Thank you. Good points all around regarding the cob. Always, Ann.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: thetaclear		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/removing-arbitraries-from-the-arbitraries-again/#comment-114269</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thetaclear]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 18:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=26100#comment-114269</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/removing-arbitraries-from-the-arbitraries-again/#comment-114055&quot;&gt;BKmole&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks , BKmole !]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/removing-arbitraries-from-the-arbitraries-again/#comment-114055">BKmole</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks , BKmole !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: thetaclear		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/removing-arbitraries-from-the-arbitraries-again/#comment-114268</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thetaclear]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 18:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=26100#comment-114268</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/removing-arbitraries-from-the-arbitraries-again/#comment-114057&quot;&gt;Ann B Watson&lt;/a&gt;.

You are most welcome , dear Ann ; and thanks for the validation sweetie. 

Love ,
Peter]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/removing-arbitraries-from-the-arbitraries-again/#comment-114057">Ann B Watson</a>.</p>
<p>You are most welcome , dear Ann ; and thanks for the validation sweetie. </p>
<p>Love ,<br />
Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: thetaclear		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/removing-arbitraries-from-the-arbitraries-again/#comment-114267</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thetaclear]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 18:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=26100#comment-114267</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/removing-arbitraries-from-the-arbitraries-again/#comment-114047&quot;&gt;RogerHornaday&lt;/a&gt;.

Roger : &quot;Peter, I don’t think you’re too enturbulated today to make sense. I also think it’s funny when people object to David Miscavige’s altering the “tech” when everybody knows if you want to sell an old product you have to be able to market it as “NEW AND IMPROVED” every so often. ESPECIALLY when the general, though unexpressed, reaction to the original was disappointment!&quot;


Thanks , dear Roger ; and yes , I agree with your assertions there.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/removing-arbitraries-from-the-arbitraries-again/#comment-114047">RogerHornaday</a>.</p>
<p>Roger : &#8220;Peter, I don’t think you’re too enturbulated today to make sense. I also think it’s funny when people object to David Miscavige’s altering the “tech” when everybody knows if you want to sell an old product you have to be able to market it as “NEW AND IMPROVED” every so often. ESPECIALLY when the general, though unexpressed, reaction to the original was disappointment!&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks , dear Roger ; and yes , I agree with your assertions there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: thetaclear		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/removing-arbitraries-from-the-arbitraries-again/#comment-114265</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thetaclear]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 18:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=26100#comment-114265</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/removing-arbitraries-from-the-arbitraries-again/#comment-114014&quot;&gt;Gary W.&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks , Gary !]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/removing-arbitraries-from-the-arbitraries-again/#comment-114014">Gary W.</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks , Gary !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: thetaclear		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/removing-arbitraries-from-the-arbitraries-again/#comment-114264</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thetaclear]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 18:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=26100#comment-114264</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/removing-arbitraries-from-the-arbitraries-again/#comment-114015&quot;&gt;Gary W.&lt;/a&gt;.

&quot;LR Hubbard and DM or both sociopaths. And both are evil men.&quot;

Yes , they are!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/removing-arbitraries-from-the-arbitraries-again/#comment-114015">Gary W.</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;LR Hubbard and DM or both sociopaths. And both are evil men.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes , they are!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: thetaclear		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/removing-arbitraries-from-the-arbitraries-again/#comment-114263</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thetaclear]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 18:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=26100#comment-114263</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/removing-arbitraries-from-the-arbitraries-again/#comment-114020&quot;&gt;unelectedfloofgoofer&lt;/a&gt;.

&quot;Prediction:
If Captain David Miscavige were to suddenly drop dead, his most ruthless subordinate or lieutenant will take over, probably whoever runs OSA black ops.
It may be someone we haven’t even heard of.
Then he will pretend that Miscavige died of relentless overwork preparing the new levels, and he will quickly have something cooked up to release for profit.&quot;


Probably so , Unelectedfloofgoofer!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/removing-arbitraries-from-the-arbitraries-again/#comment-114020">unelectedfloofgoofer</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;Prediction:<br />
If Captain David Miscavige were to suddenly drop dead, his most ruthless subordinate or lieutenant will take over, probably whoever runs OSA black ops.<br />
It may be someone we haven’t even heard of.<br />
Then he will pretend that Miscavige died of relentless overwork preparing the new levels, and he will quickly have something cooked up to release for profit.&#8221;</p>
<p>Probably so , Unelectedfloofgoofer!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: thetaclear		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/removing-arbitraries-from-the-arbitraries-again/#comment-114262</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thetaclear]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 18:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=26100#comment-114262</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/removing-arbitraries-from-the-arbitraries-again/#comment-114023&quot;&gt;Searcher&lt;/a&gt;.

Searcher : &quot;This gets to the heart of what I’ve been researching for years and speaks to all the Ron haters. If the Tech had no value, why did the CIA and others spend millions on the remote viewing programs that had a basis in the OT levels and why were a great many of the shakers and movers in these programs OT’s themselves?&quot;


Get your facts straight , Searcher ; they abandoned that program as unworkable. What they call now , as well as other websites on that calls it , &quot;Remote Viewing&quot; has absolutely NOTHING to do with OT levels at all. It is but a bunch of mumbo-jumbo and nothing more. But then again , if you would have taken the time to do a little research to honor your pen name , you would have arrived at those same conclusions yourself. So , honor your name , would you ?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/removing-arbitraries-from-the-arbitraries-again/#comment-114023">Searcher</a>.</p>
<p>Searcher : &#8220;This gets to the heart of what I’ve been researching for years and speaks to all the Ron haters. If the Tech had no value, why did the CIA and others spend millions on the remote viewing programs that had a basis in the OT levels and why were a great many of the shakers and movers in these programs OT’s themselves?&#8221;</p>
<p>Get your facts straight , Searcher ; they abandoned that program as unworkable. What they call now , as well as other websites on that calls it , &#8220;Remote Viewing&#8221; has absolutely NOTHING to do with OT levels at all. It is but a bunch of mumbo-jumbo and nothing more. But then again , if you would have taken the time to do a little research to honor your pen name , you would have arrived at those same conclusions yourself. So , honor your name , would you ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: thetaclear		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/removing-arbitraries-from-the-arbitraries-again/#comment-114261</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thetaclear]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 18:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=26100#comment-114261</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/removing-arbitraries-from-the-arbitraries-again/#comment-114024&quot;&gt;Dawn&lt;/a&gt;.

Dawn : &quot;This is very well, put.&#039;

Thanks!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/removing-arbitraries-from-the-arbitraries-again/#comment-114024">Dawn</a>.</p>
<p>Dawn : &#8220;This is very well, put.&#8217;</p>
<p>Thanks!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
