Comments on: Scientology Advertising Fail https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-advertising-fail/ Something Can Be Done About It Wed, 28 Feb 2018 13:54:18 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Where’s The Beef? https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-advertising-fail/#comment-211296 Wed, 28 Feb 2018 13:54:18 +0000 http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=131797#comment-211296 […] recently posted about the ineffectiveness of the massive investment scientology made into TV advertising. It has […]

]]> By: Alcoboy https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-advertising-fail/#comment-211279 Wed, 28 Feb 2018 03:18:54 +0000 http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=131797#comment-211279 In reply to Mark E Paulson.

To: Mark E Paulson.
From: David Miscavige COB RTC
Re: Dan Sherman.

All right! Listen up, Mark E ! I do not always need Dan Sherman to write stuff for me, especially when dealing with insignificant little turds like you!
So, there!

ML
Dave.

]]> By: Aquamarine https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-advertising-fail/#comment-211271 Wed, 28 Feb 2018 01:26:54 +0000 http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=131797#comment-211271 In reply to I Yawnalot.

Gosh, no, I missed that one. Alas 🙂

]]> By: Aquamarine https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-advertising-fail/#comment-211268 Wed, 28 Feb 2018 01:19:06 +0000 http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=131797#comment-211268 In reply to Frodis73.

Me too! I’m intrigued.

]]> By: Aquamarine https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-advertising-fail/#comment-211267 Wed, 28 Feb 2018 01:13:57 +0000 http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=131797#comment-211267 In reply to Richard.

I’m with Richard on this, Mike. Fine with how you have things set up now, but if for any reason you decide to change anything that’ll be OK too.

]]> By: Leanne https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-advertising-fail/#comment-211251 Tue, 27 Feb 2018 22:11:34 +0000 http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=131797#comment-211251 Somewhat on topic – when I first started googling “Mike Rinder” in order to read this blog, the first sites that came up were smear sites. These days, the Wikipedia page (which I have never visited, same as the smear sites) comes up first, followed by this blog and then the Twitter feed. The smear sites and main scam site are 4th and 5th on the list. I thought this might be reflective of my personal usage, but in that case the blog should come up first. I now believe it reflects a more global trend.

]]> By: Cre8tivewmn https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-advertising-fail/#comment-211238 Tue, 27 Feb 2018 19:10:15 +0000 http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=131797#comment-211238 In reply to disco george.

Lol my social media is “crossing streams” never expected a dpp reference here!

]]> By: Frodis73 https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-advertising-fail/#comment-211225 Tue, 27 Feb 2018 17:36:36 +0000 http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=131797#comment-211225 In reply to Mike Rinder.

Oh! I can’t wait to read this one!

]]> By: Old Surfer Dude https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-advertising-fail/#comment-211224 Tue, 27 Feb 2018 17:30:38 +0000 http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=131797#comment-211224 In reply to Aquamarine.

Clams, oysters, it’s all the same.

]]> By: I Yawnalot https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-advertising-fail/#comment-211219 Tue, 27 Feb 2018 16:43:20 +0000 http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=131797#comment-211219 In reply to Aquamarine.

Got my gross out pill in the mail y’day. It came in a sample pack addressed to the “householder”. The happy pills went first, but they weren’t nearly as good as advertised but the gross out ones… oh yeah!
Do you remember the Monty Python (?) sketch about the Mallard Phiz and the dog turd and tonic?

]]>