Comments on: Scientology.org v. Rinders Blog https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-org-v-rinders-blog/ Something Can Be Done About It Sun, 19 May 2013 00:36:11 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Scott Campbell https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-org-v-rinders-blog/#comment-3811 Sun, 19 May 2013 00:36:11 +0000 http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=12243#comment-3811 Way to go Mike!

]]> By: Mike Laws https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-org-v-rinders-blog/#comment-3810 Sat, 18 May 2013 23:07:06 +0000 http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=12243#comment-3810 In reply to Stat Correction.

Stat,

I don’t see it as that big a % difference, roughly 30% if my math is right. Understanding on one side you have a multi billion dollar Goliath, and the other Rinder, writing out of his living room, while keeping a day job running and diapers changed on young jack, a blog only a couple months old, I would evaluate the difference as relatively minimal!!

]]> By: Tara https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-org-v-rinders-blog/#comment-3806 Sat, 18 May 2013 22:25:50 +0000 http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=12243#comment-3806 In reply to Chris Mann.

Tanning beds, little food (as it may be poisoned) guilded thongs, scotch and heavy makeup just don’t go well together…

]]> By: Rusty https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-org-v-rinders-blog/#comment-3803 Sat, 18 May 2013 21:52:02 +0000 http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=12243#comment-3803 Rinder … No dancing in the end zone, pls. Hubris. Not so nice.

(Nonetheless, I take your point.)

]]> By: Aquamarine https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-org-v-rinders-blog/#comment-3798 Sat, 18 May 2013 20:34:07 +0000 http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=12243#comment-3798 Mike Rinder, you just ROCK, that’s all! Excellent new, excellent job you are doing – THANK YOU !!!

]]> By: Blue Seagull https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-org-v-rinders-blog/#comment-3795 Sat, 18 May 2013 19:59:14 +0000 http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=12243#comment-3795 Honestly reported stats are what reflect the true scene and cut through all the PR. And the trend of a stat tells you what condition it’s in. Enough said. Well done Mike – really enjoying this blog.

]]> By: El Jeffe https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-org-v-rinders-blog/#comment-3791 Sat, 18 May 2013 19:03:06 +0000 http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=12243#comment-3791 Straight up and vertical! I love it!

]]> By: Stat Correction https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-org-v-rinders-blog/#comment-3777 Sat, 18 May 2013 15:32:31 +0000 http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=12243#comment-3777 Up is up and that’s all that matters!

]]> By: Wendy Munro https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-org-v-rinders-blog/#comment-3774 Sat, 18 May 2013 14:54:12 +0000 http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=12243#comment-3774 In reply to Stat Correction.

Stat Correction – the 0.0013 of the RCS was the seven day blip co-incident with the Portland opening – and likely because of the media courage because of the photoshopped picture. I seem to recall the stat of that website also spiked when Tom Cruise got divorced (to me that reflects morbid curiosity rather than real interest). On these graphs the RCS trend is down and Mike’s trend is up. Most impressive is the super-imposed graphs……… a picture paints a thousand words.

Well done Mike!

]]> By: Emeka https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-org-v-rinders-blog/#comment-3738 Sat, 18 May 2013 06:34:49 +0000 http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=12243#comment-3738 Impressive stats, Mike:-)

]]>