<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Scientology Responds for Tom Cruise	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-responds-for-tom-cruise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-responds-for-tom-cruise/</link>
	<description>Something Can Be Done About It</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2020 14:19:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Rinder		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-responds-for-tom-cruise/#comment-375135</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Rinder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2020 14:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=2590824#comment-375135</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-responds-for-tom-cruise/#comment-375107&quot;&gt;Covid-20&lt;/a&gt;.

You don’t need to “see” anything further, you are plainly wrong.

Read Lawrence Wright’s fantastic article in the new edition of the New Yorker for all the information you could ever need and a whole lot more.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-responds-for-tom-cruise/#comment-375107">Covid-20</a>.</p>
<p>You don’t need to “see” anything further, you are plainly wrong.</p>
<p>Read Lawrence Wright’s fantastic article in the new edition of the New Yorker for all the information you could ever need and a whole lot more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Covid-20		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-responds-for-tom-cruise/#comment-375107</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Covid-20]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2020 10:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=2590824#comment-375107</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[so the COS is buying into this Covid nonsense all derived from the RT-PCR test whcih is NOT a virus test at all.

Merely indicates an infection of unknown cause that the Leaders have decided to name covid-19.

I thought DM had dome OT III and would recognise the latest dramatisation of that evil thing?

But then he is New Woke like most people and will simply go along with it all until everything is gone and the west is run like China.

Hope I am wrong.

Let&#039;s see shall we?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so the COS is buying into this Covid nonsense all derived from the RT-PCR test whcih is NOT a virus test at all.</p>
<p>Merely indicates an infection of unknown cause that the Leaders have decided to name covid-19.</p>
<p>I thought DM had dome OT III and would recognise the latest dramatisation of that evil thing?</p>
<p>But then he is New Woke like most people and will simply go along with it all until everything is gone and the west is run like China.</p>
<p>Hope I am wrong.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see shall we?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Komodo Dragon		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-responds-for-tom-cruise/#comment-374983</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Komodo Dragon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2020 19:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=2590824#comment-374983</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-responds-for-tom-cruise/#comment-374219&quot;&gt;PickAnotherID&lt;/a&gt;.

Cruise was only channeling DM.  I think DM was sooo very proud of his &quot;mimi me&quot;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-responds-for-tom-cruise/#comment-374219">PickAnotherID</a>.</p>
<p>Cruise was only channeling DM.  I think DM was sooo very proud of his &#8220;mimi me&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Peridot		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-responds-for-tom-cruise/#comment-374368</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peridot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2020 16:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=2590824#comment-374368</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In yet another unremarkable move to not employ some of its own written down LRH technology the aspiring empire strikes back. 

Any in the governing ranks who are Data Series trained should have some notion of sequencing out which exact tool applies to which exact situation.

In instances such as these, I commonly wonder why this self-characterizing high elite group puts out a response at all. There is an LRH issue wherein he talks of how Scientologists fuel entheta communication lines by engaging with them. He gives an example of how the Founding Church in Washington DC added to or helped to generate further entheta against them by responding to, thereby adding to and increasing these “lines” with their own energy and power.

Funny thing, this is one of those bits of wisdom noted by LRH that is useful and works. It may, too, fall into the category of “commonly known.” My mother advised when I was a kid that a good way to handle someone you feel is bullying or attacking is to not engage.

All the (instead) machinations and craziness, the “hate websites” — it is just exponentially making their image WORSE. Other common wisdom: When sinking in quicksand, the way to survive is make yourself light, not thrash and add to the “solidity.”

Until stepping out of the C of S bubble, I did not fully appreciate all this (other) LRH directive around “Attack, Attack.” As many of us find cause to utter in this forum: PICK A LANE already.  Which is it—Are you the good guys “freeing people” and keying them out, raising up the culture and race to a new level, or are you just a bunch of schoolyard thugs doin’ damage and looking for opportunities to raise Cain?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In yet another unremarkable move to not employ some of its own written down LRH technology the aspiring empire strikes back. </p>
<p>Any in the governing ranks who are Data Series trained should have some notion of sequencing out which exact tool applies to which exact situation.</p>
<p>In instances such as these, I commonly wonder why this self-characterizing high elite group puts out a response at all. There is an LRH issue wherein he talks of how Scientologists fuel entheta communication lines by engaging with them. He gives an example of how the Founding Church in Washington DC added to or helped to generate further entheta against them by responding to, thereby adding to and increasing these “lines” with their own energy and power.</p>
<p>Funny thing, this is one of those bits of wisdom noted by LRH that is useful and works. It may, too, fall into the category of “commonly known.” My mother advised when I was a kid that a good way to handle someone you feel is bullying or attacking is to not engage.</p>
<p>All the (instead) machinations and craziness, the “hate websites” — it is just exponentially making their image WORSE. Other common wisdom: When sinking in quicksand, the way to survive is make yourself light, not thrash and add to the “solidity.”</p>
<p>Until stepping out of the C of S bubble, I did not fully appreciate all this (other) LRH directive around “Attack, Attack.” As many of us find cause to utter in this forum: PICK A LANE already.  Which is it—Are you the good guys “freeing people” and keying them out, raising up the culture and race to a new level, or are you just a bunch of schoolyard thugs doin’ damage and looking for opportunities to raise Cain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bee Moo		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-responds-for-tom-cruise/#comment-374351</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bee Moo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2020 13:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=2590824#comment-374351</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-responds-for-tom-cruise/#comment-374211&quot;&gt;Zee Moo&lt;/a&gt;.

Xenu&#039;s long lost brother, Bee-Moo, needs return to earth, and St. Nicholas style deposit a new batch of implanted &quot;body-thetans&quot; 

Gift all earthlings with  a new round of R6(R-revised) of 36 and 1/2 days of implanted &quot;body-thetans.&quot;

It&#039;s possible the old Xenu batch of &quot;body-thetans&quot; is starting to wear out in their effect.  


And then Church of Scientology need to come up with new revised OT levels, and recycle all earth OT 8 super Scientologists, back through OT 3R, 4R, 5R, 6R and 7R.  (More exorcism.)

That could be Xenu&#039;s brother Bee-Moo&#039;s Christmas gift to earth.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-responds-for-tom-cruise/#comment-374211">Zee Moo</a>.</p>
<p>Xenu&#8217;s long lost brother, Bee-Moo, needs return to earth, and St. Nicholas style deposit a new batch of implanted &#8220;body-thetans&#8221; </p>
<p>Gift all earthlings with  a new round of R6(R-revised) of 36 and 1/2 days of implanted &#8220;body-thetans.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s possible the old Xenu batch of &#8220;body-thetans&#8221; is starting to wear out in their effect.  </p>
<p>And then Church of Scientology need to come up with new revised OT levels, and recycle all earth OT 8 super Scientologists, back through OT 3R, 4R, 5R, 6R and 7R.  (More exorcism.)</p>
<p>That could be Xenu&#8217;s brother Bee-Moo&#8217;s Christmas gift to earth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: chuckbeattyx75to03		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-responds-for-tom-cruise/#comment-374339</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chuckbeattyx75to03]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2020 12:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=2590824#comment-374339</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-responds-for-tom-cruise/#comment-374308&quot;&gt;Linear13&lt;/a&gt;.

Great assessment.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-responds-for-tom-cruise/#comment-374308">Linear13</a>.</p>
<p>Great assessment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nancy Vasta		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-responds-for-tom-cruise/#comment-374316</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nancy Vasta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2020 07:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=2590824#comment-374316</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[To all Scientology lemming followers of David Miscavaige and Tom Cruise....please,shovels down because I am metaphorically drowning in your lies and bullshit.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To all Scientology lemming followers of David Miscavaige and Tom Cruise&#8230;.please,shovels down because I am metaphorically drowning in your lies and bullshit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Skyler		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-responds-for-tom-cruise/#comment-374310</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skyler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2020 07:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=2590824#comment-374310</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-responds-for-tom-cruise/#comment-374245&quot;&gt;Richard&lt;/a&gt;.

I would change that slightly to the present tense to say, &quot;he is making it worse and has been making it worse for many years now&quot;. 

It will soon be so bad that it will not be possible for it to become any worse.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-responds-for-tom-cruise/#comment-374245">Richard</a>.</p>
<p>I would change that slightly to the present tense to say, &#8220;he is making it worse and has been making it worse for many years now&#8221;. </p>
<p>It will soon be so bad that it will not be possible for it to become any worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Linear13		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-responds-for-tom-cruise/#comment-374308</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Linear13]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2020 07:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=2590824#comment-374308</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I’ve been wondering the same thing...who leaked this audio of the Crooze Rant?  The sets of his movies are like a fortress.  No ‘unofficial’ photos or videos ever escape those shoots. Yet this one did.  Where was the first place it showed up?  A Facebook page or a mainstream media site?  I don’t know.  Maybe someone out there can find out.  I just can’t see even a disgruntled employee leaking this because they would KNOW this could mean they would never work in Hollywood again.  Crews have to be trustworthy.        They sign major non-disclosure contracts where something like this would mean not only termination but a heavy lawsuit.  Plus they can narrow it down to who was in the room when the Rant happened.  But let’s face it...nothing comes off that set without permission from Crooze.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been wondering the same thing&#8230;who leaked this audio of the Crooze Rant?  The sets of his movies are like a fortress.  No ‘unofficial’ photos or videos ever escape those shoots. Yet this one did.  Where was the first place it showed up?  A Facebook page or a mainstream media site?  I don’t know.  Maybe someone out there can find out.  I just can’t see even a disgruntled employee leaking this because they would KNOW this could mean they would never work in Hollywood again.  Crews have to be trustworthy.        They sign major non-disclosure contracts where something like this would mean not only termination but a heavy lawsuit.  Plus they can narrow it down to who was in the room when the Rant happened.  But let’s face it&#8230;nothing comes off that set without permission from Crooze.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Susan Harbison		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-responds-for-tom-cruise/#comment-374293</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Harbison]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2020 04:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=2590824#comment-374293</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As far as I can tell, the cult didn&#039;t mention Leah in the recent statement about Covid. 

The cult&#039;s statement appears to have been first published on December 17, 2020  by Yahoo Entertainment as follows:

“The Church of Scientology has done more than any other religious institution in promoting COVID-19 prevention actions — throughout the U.S. and worldwide. Long before ‘stay at home’ directives, the Church took aggressive actions to prevent the spread of the virus. The Church’s leader acted well ahead of the curve,” a spokesperson told Yahoo Entertainment.

A later paragraph in the same Yahoo Entertainment article includes this, &quot;Mike Rinder claimed Cruise &#039;probably leaked this&#039; himself. (A spokesperson for the Church of Scientology refutes any claims made by Rinder.)&quot;

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/leah-remini-tom-cruises-rant-psychotic-scientology-covid19-pandemic-224721629.html

Since Yahoo Entertainment claims the cult&#039;s statement was given directly to them, I&#039;m going to assume they published the entire statement.  The cult&#039;s statement references the &quot;Church&#039;s leader&quot; without naming him!  It looks to me like DM did not want his name to appear in any more articles about TC&#039;s meltdown.  I wonder how TC feels about that.

So how did the statement about Leah Remini become part of the cult&#039;s statement?   

On December 18, 2020 a site called The Wrap published their version of the cult&#039;s statement.  The first two sentences match YE&#039;s version.  The change occurs in sentence three,  &quot;The Church’s leader acted well ahead of the curve,” a representative of the Church of Scientology said in a statement. &quot;Remini is an unreliable source who attacks Scientology for publicity and money–as she herself has admitted.”

You will note The Wrap did not cite Yahoo Entertainment (or anyone else) as its source.  The part about Leah has been separated from the cult&#039;s statement, but it still reads as if it was part of the cult&#039;s recent statement.  Today in The Wrap&#039;s comment section I asked about the discrepancy, but my comment has not been published.    

On December 21, 2020 Cinema Blend published The Wrap&#039;s version of the cult&#039;s statement, citing The Wrap as their source.  Numerous other internet news sites are also quoting The Wrap.  Today in CB&#039;s comment section I asked about the discrepancy, but my comment has not been published.

Quite a few internet news sites are quoting The Wrap&#039;s version of the cult&#039;s statement.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I can tell, the cult didn&#8217;t mention Leah in the recent statement about Covid. </p>
<p>The cult&#8217;s statement appears to have been first published on December 17, 2020  by Yahoo Entertainment as follows:</p>
<p>“The Church of Scientology has done more than any other religious institution in promoting COVID-19 prevention actions — throughout the U.S. and worldwide. Long before ‘stay at home’ directives, the Church took aggressive actions to prevent the spread of the virus. The Church’s leader acted well ahead of the curve,” a spokesperson told Yahoo Entertainment.</p>
<p>A later paragraph in the same Yahoo Entertainment article includes this, &#8220;Mike Rinder claimed Cruise &#8216;probably leaked this&#8217; himself. (A spokesperson for the Church of Scientology refutes any claims made by Rinder.)&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/leah-remini-tom-cruises-rant-psychotic-scientology-covid19-pandemic-224721629.html" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/leah-remini-tom-cruises-rant-psychotic-scientology-covid19-pandemic-224721629.html</a></p>
<p>Since Yahoo Entertainment claims the cult&#8217;s statement was given directly to them, I&#8217;m going to assume they published the entire statement.  The cult&#8217;s statement references the &#8220;Church&#8217;s leader&#8221; without naming him!  It looks to me like DM did not want his name to appear in any more articles about TC&#8217;s meltdown.  I wonder how TC feels about that.</p>
<p>So how did the statement about Leah Remini become part of the cult&#8217;s statement?   </p>
<p>On December 18, 2020 a site called The Wrap published their version of the cult&#8217;s statement.  The first two sentences match YE&#8217;s version.  The change occurs in sentence three,  &#8220;The Church’s leader acted well ahead of the curve,” a representative of the Church of Scientology said in a statement. &#8220;Remini is an unreliable source who attacks Scientology for publicity and money–as she herself has admitted.”</p>
<p>You will note The Wrap did not cite Yahoo Entertainment (or anyone else) as its source.  The part about Leah has been separated from the cult&#8217;s statement, but it still reads as if it was part of the cult&#8217;s recent statement.  Today in The Wrap&#8217;s comment section I asked about the discrepancy, but my comment has not been published.    </p>
<p>On December 21, 2020 Cinema Blend published The Wrap&#8217;s version of the cult&#8217;s statement, citing The Wrap as their source.  Numerous other internet news sites are also quoting The Wrap.  Today in CB&#8217;s comment section I asked about the discrepancy, but my comment has not been published.</p>
<p>Quite a few internet news sites are quoting The Wrap&#8217;s version of the cult&#8217;s statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
