Thanks, Cindy. I just know that if I had looked in on this blog when I was still ignorant of what was really going on in the CoS, I wouldn’t have believed what was being said about it if at the same time wins with the tech was being invalidated. The other thing I believe readers should know is that the tech is available outside the church and that some of the best tech-trained people are out here delivering it. So your support is appreciated. 🙂

Miraldi, I understand what you are saying and I agree with you. Just ignore Espiando. And feel free to publish all the wins you want. Things are never all black or all white, despite what some people dramatize.

A lot of people have positive experience driving Fords. I’ve owned three of them and they’ve all been shit. I’m not buying one ever again, no matter what someone on a website says about the new Focus.

Projects? You might be thinking of My 2 Cents.

What I said in my post above was this: “I agree that the views being expressed on this series should include those of people who have gotten a lot out of the original principles and practices.”

And previously, I have stated that Mike’s blog should include positive statements about Scientology – because readers who have had positive experiences will not give credibility to a blog that only has negative comments.

You COMPLETELY misunderstood me.

YOU keep expressing (over MANY months) your desire to have OTHERS produce pro-scn material. (see your first post in THIS thread as just one out of MANY examples). YOU should produce such projects yourself.

As I’ve said before, I feel this point of view should be expressed here on Mike’s, for the reasons I’ve given. And I give Mike great credit for his willingness to allow all viewpoints. Including both yours and mine. 😉

penny, Mike isn’t stopping people from “cleaning up” scientology. People who advocate such would probably better spend their time doing just that, than telling other people what you want THEM to do to get it done.

Just a thought.