Comments on: Scientology’s Latest Harassment of Mark Bunker — Why It’s Important to Re-elect Him

By: Kim Johannesen

Kim Johannesen — Mon, 11 Mar 2024 09:15:45 +0000

If it is not “a church matter”, Ben Shaw did not do his job, or he has forgotten about the fact that Mark Bunker has been fighting, the downtown CW takeover, by COS, and that this is a church matter. Either way, Ben Shaw, should be fired by COS:)

Kind regards
Kim

By: otherles

otherles — Sun, 10 Mar 2024 14:30:40 +0000

Gosh, what a surprise!

By: Starring Tom Cruise as David Miscavige

Starring Tom Cruise as David Miscavige — Sun, 10 Mar 2024 13:43:39 +0000

Hey Mike,

The resistance movement that is alive and growing needs your help. Publicize a part of it on your blog. They need help and encouragement!! Maybe the part that shows the relationship of the LAPD and their willing weaponized usage.

Signed,

One who wants to see the cult exposed!!

By: Peggy L

Peggy L — Sun, 10 Mar 2024 11:38:02 +0000

Seems like Ben Shaw & Baghdad Bob have something in common.

By: Phillip

Phillip — Sun, 10 Mar 2024 03:16:04 +0000

Question: Ben, does this incident qualify as out-PR or whatever the term is that $ci. uses?

By: Glenn

Glenn — Sat, 09 Mar 2024 21:56:41 +0000

Absolutely loved that the police did not prosecute the thieves because Bunker said: “They are probably not bad people, they just have been told that anybody who says something negative about Scientology is a criminal”. Great High Road Mark. Great indeed. Shows just how ethical and caring you are. You’d have my vote if I lived there.

By: Patty Moher

Patty Moher — Sat, 09 Mar 2024 19:14:16 +0000

I was really doubtful at first that this was an OSA op because these two dummies not only got caught but admitted they were Scientologists! Wow. If Ben Shaw coordinated this fiasco then this is just a major fuck up.

But now relooking at it I can see this was done with the approval of Ben Shaw. No way would seasoned Scientologists living in CW, do anything like this without OSA’s approval.

By: AnEx

AnEx — Sat, 09 Mar 2024 17:07:37 +0000

Shaw’s statement is just hilarious. He’s shouting “anti-religious propaganda” faster than you can ask the question.

It could be that the action was part of a Liability formula (…deliver an effective blow to the enemies of the group …) the two of them have to apply. As that obviously went totally wrong they should be in Doubt or lower by now.

By: Scamology Dying

Scamology Dying — Sat, 09 Mar 2024 14:32:39 +0000

“Any attempt to involve the Church is simply a continuation of your anti-religious propaganda.”

So, according to the CoS the scientologists who perpetrated the crimes BECAUSE of CHURCH POLICY were trying to spread anti-religious propaganda against the CoS?

Seems unlikely to me. But hey, what do I know?