https://www.google.cz/maps/@50.0812984,14.4295832,3a,90y,122.81h,85.92t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s6rTDIF7RlEuLHv-woR3Zfw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656!6m1!1e1?hl=cs

One sign in ugly building in a street which used to be a good address but now it’s mostly small old shops.

From Wikipedia, it sounds so possible that Hubbard caught wind of Coue:

“Émile Coué de la Châtaigneraie (French: [emil kue də la ʃɑtɛɲʁɛ]; 26 February 1857 – 2 July 1926) was a French psychologist and pharmacist who introduced a popular method of psychotherapy and self-improvement based on optimistic autosuggestion.[1]

“Considered at times to represent a second Nancy School, Coué treated many patients in groups and free of charge.”

LOL, DITTO!

Yeah, OSD, he’s low as can be — proof his batteries are running out; too bad they don’t manufacture such tiny batteries anymore. He’ll be so desperate, he’ll be plugging any near-by electric socket for a charge soon. Right Dildoe Dave?!

Peter, Thank you for your detailed reply. You provide me with much joy. I look forward to updates on your body of work.

Richard : “I think I misread something – human electronic flows=e-meter? Oh well, you get the idea. lol”

Peter : Yes , the E-meter phenomena , and the electronic flows surrounding the body. That research is much older than LRH. Google search “Mesmerism” to find more about it.

Richard : “How about “on the same wavelength”?”

Peter : Sound great! :-)))

Richard : “While I’m here, I read some of the reviews of Self Mastery at amazon. It got me to wondering are you working on your own thesis shall we call it, compiling what you feel are essentials from sources you have studied and thus recommending, or some combination thereof, if that makes sense.”

Peter : Yes , I am ; been doing that for the last year or so. I am currently studying all about hypnosis , and more specifically , about “Self-hypnosis” , or more properly “Self-suggestion”. Fascinating subject , indeed. I had dismissed it ,because I was still under LRH’s undue influence with his invalidation of that subject. You know how it was , “LRH was right about EVERYTHING”. Then one day I stumbled upon that little book from Emile Coue , and my horizon really opened up. I then , began an intense research of the subject using academic sources. I am testing the methods in myself first , to then test it on others to establish the degree of workability.

I am Studying as well the history of philosophy using Will Duran’s works mostly (he is VERY through) , to isolate common denominators to it all ; principles that seems to have worked invariably for any culture at any time in history. Concepts that seems to attract general agreement. Then apply real scientific methodology to it ; compile and organize it into something usable and easy to understand by generally educated people ; and publish my findings FOR FREE , so that it be available for everybody. My work on that will always be free. I feel that I owe my help to humanity and not the opposite. I came to serve others , not to be served ; to be selfless and not selfish. I am very very far from being perfect ; I have 10x more flaws than the general able individual has ; I possibly spoiled my only chance at redemption this life-time ; but I am honest enough. With me , what you see is what you get.

So stay tuned ; the work is in the making.

Take care , my friend.

Peter

Richard : “Excellent, Peter. Once again I am pleased that Mike allows discussion. I don’t type very fast so I try to be brief.”

Peter : Got it!

Richard : “I “went dianetic clear” on the dianetic drug rundown around 1982(?) so I have looked at lots of engrams chains. My point in replying to Chuck was that I don’t want anyone to get sucked into the CoS by natural curiosity about past life recall.”

Peter : Thank you ; I now understand what you meant by that.

Richard : “I have read that Buddha had detailed recall of his past lives, but I ain’t Buddha! So my point as stated above is that digging in and trying to assemble and review any possible past life would be futile for me and I would suppose most others. What would be the point, anyhow?”

Peter : The point , dear Richard , is the thrill of discovery ; the adventure into “Tierra Incognita”. Those points all by itself , are fascinating regardless of any therapeutic value or lack thereof , which I think it DOES have. I got to admin that I have “Vulcan” blood. :-)))

Richard : “If for no other reason than copyright protection, LRH’s name appears on all materials and only an expert such as yourself would be able to deconstruct and reassemble something along the lines of scn and would need a team.”

Peter : Thanks for the validation and the vote of confidence , dear Richard ; though it feels undeserved.

Richard : “You have mentioned in the past that you might attempt to do so. If you get whatever your thoughts are right now on a blog and “open source” it so to speak something just might happen. From what you write above you have already distilled many things down to basics. That is up to you when it feels right.”

Peter : Thanks for the suggestion. That’s the plan , essentially. I am sorting out the key principles from the mere generalizations and false data ; the invariably workable from the hype ; the important data from the cosmetic ornaments.

Richard : “I hope we are now on the same “human electronic flow” (joke) 🙂 – Richard”

Peter : Yes , we sure are , my friend! :-)))

I think I misread something – human electronic flows=e-meter? Oh well, you get the idea. lol How about “on the same wavelength”? While I’m here, I read some of the reviews of Self Mastery at amazon. It got me to wondering are you working on your own thesis shall we call it, compiling what you feel are essentials from sources you have studied and thus recommending, or some combination thereof, if that makes sense.

Excellent, Peter. Once again I am pleased that Mike allows discussion. I don’t type very fast so I try to be brief. I “went dianetic clear” on the dianetic drug rundown around 1982(?) so I have looked at lots of engrams chains. My point in replying to Chuck was that I don’t want anyone to get sucked into the CoS by natural curiosity about past life recall.

I have read that Buddha had detailed recall of his past lives, but I ain’t Buddha! So my point as stated above is that digging in and trying to assemble and review any possible past life would be futile for me and I would suppose most others. What would be the point, anyhow?

If for no other reason than copyright protection, LRH’s name appears on all materials and only an expert such as yourself would be able to deconstruct and reassemble something along the lines of scn and would need a team. You have mentioned in the past that you might attempt to do so. If you get whatever your thoughts are right now on a blog and “open source” it so to speak something just might happen. From what you write above you have already distilled many things down to basics. That is up to you when it feels right.

I hope we are now on the same “human electronic flow” (joke) 🙂 – Richard

Thank you Annie, I felt the magic. Sending some guardian angels to watch over you. XXOO