so sad, and so true.

thank you

I cannot claim to understand the sensitivity to ethnic remark you made though.

Don’t do ethnics only Ethics.

As I have said before. If the Tech did not work for someone thats too bad.

They should perhaps do the following for a start

1) Go and get some standard repair action from a proven professional not some squirrel who claims he’s OT8 and Class 8 hooked on booze and nicotine like some Euro loonie I know too well.

2)Handle forever the bypassed charge and start to get some gains in life.

3) Start actually reading rthe Tech and applying it. Too many professional PC’s in and out of the Org cause trouble.

4) Write up OW’s it does actually work.

5) Get word cleared Method 1 and do the KTL course

6) Get out lists sorted VERY important

7)Trying to Stop all the time is the basis of insanity.

8)Stop moaning about LRH because what the hell did they come up with instead, er that would be entheta and natter, its pathetic beyond belief to be wittering on about how the Tech does not work LRH was this he was that yip yap yip.

If someone feels like this why not go and shoot themselves and stop bothering others with their wishy washy bypassed charge all the time.

We have a phrase here put up or shut up.

If none of the above help then thats it,

One is actually an SP and nothing is going to work so they should please piss off from this blog and go stir the shit somwhere else.

Thats my advice to the raving twits who cannot accept that the Tech does work when its applied correctly.

Mike does excellent work here some of his posts are so bloody funnny and his choice of phrases very droll.

They always give me a good laugh and too be honest I don;t actually trust people who don’t know how to have a good laugh.

Sid Solid is being too serious.

I look at what Mike gave up to leave the current Org system and I doubt many who post crap in here ever went through what he did.

OK I mysef would not have put up with so much for so long but I had no 2d or close family in the Org at the time so maybe I got of lightly.

Whatever one feels if Scientology doesn’t work for someone OK,why burden others for whom it works perfectly with your horrible case problems every time Mike does a good post.

I hope this is of use in some small way.

regards
H

H57,

I totally agree with your sentiments here. I’ve tried to convey what you’ve succinctly written here so well.

On the other hand there are critics who post here who post here with awareness and sensitivity to the ethnic here. Such as Fred Rice and Mark Bunker and Cat Daddy and Alanzo and several others.

Of course the occasional troll is going to get through.

Personally I think Mike does his best in trying to filter out the rabid nut balls ala ESMB, OCMB and ARS.

My opinion.

But I do get what you’re saying.

“The best reason of course, is that the ideal org programmes are crap – but that won’t stop the harassment or the sec checks/roll backs/ethics chits.”

Wendy,

From personal experience giving reasons like it’s off policy, out tech and it defies common sense is usually the best way to end up being harassed, sec checked, roll backed and ethic chitted in the Bizarro world of the so called “Church of Scientology” these days.

Squirreling the tech any more than its been squirreled is somewhere down the list probably only because you’re going into direct competition with RTC.

Its a sad day indeed when you read the current managments obsession with Ideal Orgs and this insane fundraising system.

The worst thing is this crap about “getting higher in status”.

I remember there were people I worked with who went into some fawning cringe type behaviour when they met or spoke to someone who had done some OT levels.

Perhaps my Grade 0 was flat as I had no problem communicating with people whatever their case level.

I read the usual replies to this post and feel sorry for some people who made it all go so wrong in their lives, sorry existences I should say.

So much Natter and so few real engrams run out leads to this state of “all is bad”. To quote “He came, found it bad, left”.

I appreciate the work and time you put in to supplying this data to us, but this blog is becoming like the the Ex-SMB full of carping, raving, lunatic and untrue remarks, always from the same people, who are only interested in trying to stop Scientology.

They NEVER will.

This usually happens when someone receives squirrel Tech and then gives up on all of it.

There are more squirrel versions of NOTS around these days than you can shake a stick at.

You have to put something in to get something out.

You put a lot in yourself and ask for nothing in exchange.

Don’t let the exchange degenerate into a bunch of anti -Tech looneys posting entheta all the time.

We should relax and laugh abit more at the current Org’s games not become the effect of them.

regards

Guilty as charged, and proud of it!

Best solution is just don’t go. For some reason they’ve stopped bothering me. I kinda miss the game of fending them off!

1. The orgs were to create statuses and “make them important to the public” (this we know); and

2. Don’t buy the lie that the public don’t have money. They do. The way you can tell is that the prospect keeps changing the reason that he cannot donate. If he sticks to one reason why he cannot donate then you can leave him alone. (But obviously, you would need to harass a person a while to determine whether the excuses are changing or not.)

Lurkers and UTRs. If you must go to these events go ready with ONE reason why you “can’t” donate. The best reason of course, is that the ideal org programmes are crap – but that won’t stop the harassment or the sec checks/roll backs/ethics chits.

LOL, THGM77 – but the blame for that falls squarely on MJ.

Now c’mon Jose, let’s keep it theta!