Comments on: Who Good Scientologists Should Vote For

By: knatherthomas

knatherthomas — Thu, 07 Aug 2014 04:56:23 +0000

If this picks list jeapordizes their nonprofit status, how many have been sent to the IRS?

By: Hiatus57

Hiatus57 — Wed, 06 Aug 2014 22:26:16 +0000

Interesting statement,

As ALL persons who “stand” for election anywhere are in the pocket of a Corporation or “interested” group.

Why would the C of S encourage this ludicrous insult to ones intelligence called an election Campaign?

By: RK

RK — Mon, 04 Aug 2014 00:08:13 +0000

In reply to Mike Rinder. As long as the Church is not hosting the fundraiser or issuing the endorsement list, the IRS won't look into it. An example of non-action is the Mormons campaign in for Measure 8 in California.

By: Aeolus

Aeolus — Sun, 03 Aug 2014 05:00:06 +0000

The name Bruce Boyers on the ballot rings a bell. About 20 years ago there was an OT in the Glendale area by that name. Any chance he moved to Florida and is running for a judgeship?

By: Leonore

Leonore — Sun, 03 Aug 2014 04:42:16 +0000

In reply to Gary Johnson. Gary, You're not the only one. :-). Count two more of similar mind and habit in our household. I admit it rankles me, too, when people take potshots at Fox News but never, ever watch it (not that it's the final word, but I like the debate and interviews and confrontations better than the parrots and drones on mainstream channels).

By: Just Me

Just Me — Sat, 02 Aug 2014 15:08:57 +0000

How happy would any political candidates in the USA be to be “endorsed by Scientologists”?

Not so much.

By: Sir Upticious

Sir Upticious — Sat, 02 Aug 2014 14:37:37 +0000

My suggest is to broadly publish these recommendations, pointing out who is doing the recommending. The cult is so toxic, the smart politicians will have to disavow or watch their other funding dry up.

Regarding the upcoming elections: Lets clean house (and senate). Say no to incumbents!

By: Joe Pendleton

Joe Pendleton — Sat, 02 Aug 2014 05:52:35 +0000

In reply to Cooper Kessel.

Right Cooper …. I also neglected to put what you can read, what you can say, what you can think ……

By: Rick Mycroft

Rick Mycroft — Sat, 02 Aug 2014 04:12:09 +0000

In reply to Hallie Jane.

Some of those candidates and city employees might be unhappy if they find out that they’re assumed to be “on the org board”, plus it can cause bad mistakes.

LAPD Cmdr. Mike Downing had appeared at some events, and probably gave the standard civic, law’n’order speech. So someone probably figured that he was “on the org board” and assumed that it would be okay to forge his signature on an endorsement on The Way To Happiness Web site. Ooops!

The Way To More Questions August 18, 2005, Carl Kozlowski, Pasadena Weekly
http://www.pasadenaweekly.com/cms/story/detail/the_way_to_more_questions/8297/

By: KFrancis

KFrancis — Sat, 02 Aug 2014 04:02:06 +0000

If the church were a truly benevolent organization emails like this would not have to be sent out. Both political parties would be happy to support the churches good works and happily attach themselves to all the good PR the church was creating. The good works of the church would be widely known throughout the Clearwater area and the locals would be onboard with church goals.

PR is bad so Dave and OSA have to create campaigns like this to create a line of political defense around their vested interest which is basically free money for little or no exchange.