<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: WISE Guys	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/wise-guys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/wise-guys/</link>
	<description>Something Can Be Done About It</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 13:02:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Episode 74: Julian Wain on WISE		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/wise-guys/#comment-452554</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Episode 74: Julian Wain on WISE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 13:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=929930#comment-452554</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] I did an earlier post about these WISE Guys [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I did an earlier post about these WISE Guys [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jere Lull (38 years recovering		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/wise-guys/#comment-248905</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jere Lull (38 years recovering]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 22:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=929930#comment-248905</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/wise-guys/#comment-248613&quot;&gt;MarcAnon&lt;/a&gt;.

&quot;What did Hubbard know about running a business?  Absolutely NOTHING.  He had a little Navy experience, but didn&#039;t really understand how that worked; hence his being passed over for promotion EVERY time (but one).  The couple of &quot;businesses&quot; he tried to set up:  (the &quot;yacht brokerage&quot; with Parsons was simply his scaming of Parsons&#039; life savings, and the early Dianetics centers uniformly went belly-up from financial mismanagement,  Scientology seemed to have worked because it wasn&#039;t under his control at first, then after they were established in California, scientology made more money than he could waste.  Once he hit on the idea of Saint Hill, then the Sea Org, he didn&#039;t have much use for money to live his lifestyle, though he refused to pay the staff or the government or the suppliers (which is a capsule view of his Finance policy&quot;: Make money, make more money, make others produce so you can make more money. THEN pay no one you don&#039;t absolutely have to pay, even if there&#039;s no TP in the bathrooms and the power&#039;s been cut off AND the fleet&#039; has  been kicked out of the 3rd port in a row.  I DO believe he considered some  bribes a valid expense (though HE couldn&#039;t be seen as connected to any illegal activity.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/wise-guys/#comment-248613">MarcAnon</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;What did Hubbard know about running a business?  Absolutely NOTHING.  He had a little Navy experience, but didn&#8217;t really understand how that worked; hence his being passed over for promotion EVERY time (but one).  The couple of &#8220;businesses&#8221; he tried to set up:  (the &#8220;yacht brokerage&#8221; with Parsons was simply his scaming of Parsons&#8217; life savings, and the early Dianetics centers uniformly went belly-up from financial mismanagement,  Scientology seemed to have worked because it wasn&#8217;t under his control at first, then after they were established in California, scientology made more money than he could waste.  Once he hit on the idea of Saint Hill, then the Sea Org, he didn&#8217;t have much use for money to live his lifestyle, though he refused to pay the staff or the government or the suppliers (which is a capsule view of his Finance policy&#8221;: Make money, make more money, make others produce so you can make more money. THEN pay no one you don&#8217;t absolutely have to pay, even if there&#8217;s no TP in the bathrooms and the power&#8217;s been cut off AND the fleet&#8217; has  been kicked out of the 3rd port in a row.  I DO believe he considered some  bribes a valid expense (though HE couldn&#8217;t be seen as connected to any illegal activity.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jere Lull (38 years recovering		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/wise-guys/#comment-248898</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jere Lull (38 years recovering]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 21:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=929930#comment-248898</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/wise-guys/#comment-248814&quot;&gt;Elizabeth McPherson&lt;/a&gt;.

Elizabeth, there is NO &quot;absolute division&quot; between church and state, just that the state can&#039;t say what is a church or establish one religion as the official church of the US.   Churches have always commented on state actions they disagreed with. That&#039;s their god-given right (literally).

Specifically, our first Amendment states:&quot; Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.&quot;  

[Separation of church &#038; state is a different issue that probably popped up in  the UK before America seceded from the British Empire, which, AFAICT,  was when the British Empire started to disintegrate. Most Americans believe in keeping church and state separate, bu I don&#039;t believe there&#039;s any legal prohibition.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/wise-guys/#comment-248814">Elizabeth McPherson</a>.</p>
<p>Elizabeth, there is NO &#8220;absolute division&#8221; between church and state, just that the state can&#8217;t say what is a church or establish one religion as the official church of the US.   Churches have always commented on state actions they disagreed with. That&#8217;s their god-given right (literally).</p>
<p>Specifically, our first Amendment states:&#8221; Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.&#8221;  </p>
<p>[Separation of church &amp; state is a different issue that probably popped up in  the UK before America seceded from the British Empire, which, AFAICT,  was when the British Empire started to disintegrate. Most Americans believe in keeping church and state separate, bu I don&#8217;t believe there&#8217;s any legal prohibition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Rinder		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/wise-guys/#comment-248852</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Rinder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 14:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=929930#comment-248852</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/wise-guys/#comment-248814&quot;&gt;Elizabeth McPherson&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;em&gt;It does not seem to work in the manner for which it was intended: Namely, I should think, to protect their own citizens.&lt;/em&gt;

Very simplistic reason for this.

The US justice system is weighted to favor those with the most money.

When issues have arisen where the rights of the individual have clashed with the rights of the churches, the churches have usually prevailed. They have the money so they can hire the best lawyers. This has established a long history of legal precedent in the US that basically protects churches and ignores the rights of individuals. Religions are outside the purview of many laws, laws designed to protect the rights of individuals. 

In this, the constitution, designed to protect the individual against oppression from the powerful has been turned on its head to protect the powerful in abusing individuals. 

Many would argue that a lack of government oversight of religion is a good thing -- it prevents oppressing belief. But it seems that in the US the pendulum has swung too far.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/wise-guys/#comment-248814">Elizabeth McPherson</a>.</p>
<p><em>It does not seem to work in the manner for which it was intended: Namely, I should think, to protect their own citizens.</em></p>
<p>Very simplistic reason for this.</p>
<p>The US justice system is weighted to favor those with the most money.</p>
<p>When issues have arisen where the rights of the individual have clashed with the rights of the churches, the churches have usually prevailed. They have the money so they can hire the best lawyers. This has established a long history of legal precedent in the US that basically protects churches and ignores the rights of individuals. Religions are outside the purview of many laws, laws designed to protect the rights of individuals. </p>
<p>In this, the constitution, designed to protect the individual against oppression from the powerful has been turned on its head to protect the powerful in abusing individuals. </p>
<p>Many would argue that a lack of government oversight of religion is a good thing &#8212; it prevents oppressing belief. But it seems that in the US the pendulum has swung too far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: WhatAreYourCrimes		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/wise-guys/#comment-248830</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WhatAreYourCrimes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 10:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=929930#comment-248830</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hubbard was a liar... google it, all of you beloved and awesome UTRs out there.

Of course, I need not ask that of all the UTRs out there.


Oh, yeah, hey David Miscavige, did you notice there are thousands of UTR scientologists out there?

And that they may be coming for you?


Sleep well in your kid-sized silk monogrammed pajamas, ya little shit.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hubbard was a liar&#8230; google it, all of you beloved and awesome UTRs out there.</p>
<p>Of course, I need not ask that of all the UTRs out there.</p>
<p>Oh, yeah, hey David Miscavige, did you notice there are thousands of UTR scientologists out there?</p>
<p>And that they may be coming for you?</p>
<p>Sleep well in your kid-sized silk monogrammed pajamas, ya little shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Elizabeth McPherson		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/wise-guys/#comment-248814</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth McPherson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 07:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=929930#comment-248814</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One thing I have never understood about how Americans think and their overall culture. Does it not say or stress in their constitution of the absolute division BETWEEN Church and State.

It does not seem to work in the manner for which it was intended: Namely, I should think, to protect their own citizens.

If there&#039;s any American cousins out there that can explain this to and why it is not use more vociferously in legal attacks and defenses for and from the CoS.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I have never understood about how Americans think and their overall culture. Does it not say or stress in their constitution of the absolute division BETWEEN Church and State.</p>
<p>It does not seem to work in the manner for which it was intended: Namely, I should think, to protect their own citizens.</p>
<p>If there&#8217;s any American cousins out there that can explain this to and why it is not use more vociferously in legal attacks and defenses for and from the CoS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Elizabeth McPherson		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/wise-guys/#comment-248813</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth McPherson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 07:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=929930#comment-248813</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/wise-guys/#comment-248604&quot;&gt;Mike Rinder&lt;/a&gt;.

RE The :&quot;IAS status whores&quot; comment by yourself, I laughed out loud and I have NEVER encountered Scientology (what a neologism). There must be a presence in Canada,, where I live. Perhaps the increasing effects of unabated climate change ie very hot weather climates in Florida, California and Australia had made them initially more heavily targeted.

You look like your genetic background is as Irish as mine. The sun and heat actually can make me very ill, disorientated and can even trigger a seizure.   I also become  severely burnt in a short period of time. 

When I went to Israel several years ago and even at home since, I have to have a hat, long sleeve shirt over whatever I am wearing and NOT wear denim, which traps heat and hurts the skin underneath (really).

One other thought or suggestion, which could be far more effective if explained by (non-Scientology) parents rather than schools, is the SURVIVAL skill of CRITICAL thinking. It would be a metaphorical innoculation, non?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/wise-guys/#comment-248604">Mike Rinder</a>.</p>
<p>RE The :&#8221;IAS status whores&#8221; comment by yourself, I laughed out loud and I have NEVER encountered Scientology (what a neologism). There must be a presence in Canada,, where I live. Perhaps the increasing effects of unabated climate change ie very hot weather climates in Florida, California and Australia had made them initially more heavily targeted.</p>
<p>You look like your genetic background is as Irish as mine. The sun and heat actually can make me very ill, disorientated and can even trigger a seizure.   I also become  severely burnt in a short period of time. </p>
<p>When I went to Israel several years ago and even at home since, I have to have a hat, long sleeve shirt over whatever I am wearing and NOT wear denim, which traps heat and hurts the skin underneath (really).</p>
<p>One other thought or suggestion, which could be far more effective if explained by (non-Scientology) parents rather than schools, is the SURVIVAL skill of CRITICAL thinking. It would be a metaphorical innoculation, non?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nina Bass		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/wise-guys/#comment-248801</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nina Bass]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 05:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=929930#comment-248801</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Follow the money to the bank of Luxembourg]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Follow the money to the bank of Luxembourg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ann Davis		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/wise-guys/#comment-248781</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ann Davis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 03:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=929930#comment-248781</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mikerindersblog.org/wise-guys/#comment-248778&quot;&gt;Julia St.john&lt;/a&gt;.

Fascinating episode!  Still digesting]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.mikerindersblog.org/wise-guys/#comment-248778">Julia St.john</a>.</p>
<p>Fascinating episode!  Still digesting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Julia St.john		</title>
		<link>https://www.mikerindersblog.org/wise-guys/#comment-248778</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julia St.john]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 02:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikerindersblog.org/?p=929930#comment-248778</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Side bar: watching the show!
Wow... crazy sales/ closing technique s!
If the world s populations would use, this much tenacious, unrelenting technique s on positive purpose! The world would change overnight. Isn’t it amazing that all of us can picture in our minds.... failures... much more difficult to picture success, fulfillment, etc.?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Side bar: watching the show!<br />
Wow&#8230; crazy sales/ closing technique s!<br />
If the world s populations would use, this much tenacious, unrelenting technique s on positive purpose! The world would change overnight. Isn’t it amazing that all of us can picture in our minds&#8230;. failures&#8230; much more difficult to picture success, fulfillment, etc.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
