They go on: But Leah Remini doesn’t care because she has already admitted she won’t vet her sources as long as they disparage her former religion. Of course, this is a complete perversion of what she actually said. They used to complain that everyone was “scripted, rehearsed and acting” and when asked about it by an interviewer, Leah made clear this is not what happens. That is now twisted into “anyone can say anything and nobody vets it.” Equally as untrue. Scientology is grasping at straws.
They also took some weak potshots at other contributors Ronit and Yossi Charny.
Lacking anything of substance at all they strangely claim “Neither were qualified to become clergy” — but they DID. At the highest level organization, assigned to audit the HIGHEST LEVEL public in scientology.
So, if they were not qualified, why was scientology using them to audit and charging people $700 an hour for the privilege?
They sling wild allegations that they “have a history of dishonesty, lying and scheming” with absolutely NO PROOF — but again, if they are such terrible people, they are a RESULT of scientology and scientology had no problem making money from them.
They arrogantly announce the Charny’s try “to eke out a living selling cheap sunglasses and souvenirs in a Portland mall”. Frankly I don’t know WHAT they do to earn a living, and it is hardly relevant to whether they are recounting facts about their experiences in scientology. BUT I guarantee the Charny’s provide a better and more honest exchange than what scientology does for the money it pressures out of people. Pressures to the point of bankruptcy. Tens and hundreds of thousands of dollars. Millions in some case. Scientology just never learns that people in huge glass bubbles should not try to hurl boulders.
They wrap up their attack on Ronit with this: “Not to mention the fact, that like Remini, Ronit was just plain mean and nasty.” And to “prove” they rounded up a few Sea Org members for some POW style video interviews who literally say “Ronit was mean” and “not someone you liked” and “she didn’t hold herself back.”
Seriously? Apparently this proves everything she said is untrue…
How does logic work exactly? Perhaps the meanest and nastiest person I have met in my life is David Miscavige. And he is PROUD of it. So this is proof that he is a liar?
And finally, what do they use to try to discredit Vicki Marshall?
Unbelievably they resort to a Marty Rathbun video with a quote about how he had a “problem” with Leah being “mean” to her mother on the TLC show. I kid you not. This is it. Marty Rathbun’s opinion of an earlier TV show about Leah being too mean to her mother just flat out proves that everything she said was untrue.
You cannot make this stuff up.
But as I have said many times before, scientology is bound by this behavior. They have to follow what L. Ron Hubbard dictates. I laid it out here:
This is the operator’s manual of the scientology clown car.