It is amazing all the things Captain Miscavige has personally provided these powerful scientologists to enable them to “not only boom the org but truly achieve St Hill size.”
Obviously these otherwise awesome people are NOT using the brilliant tools Mr. Mickiewicz has toiled and labored so hard to bring them, as scientology orgs all over the world are shrinking rapidly. How long is it since Miscavige has announced a “St Hill Size org”? 20 years? The last one I recall was Joburg org — that might have been 2004 or 2005…
Yet, reaching St Hill Size is the target for all orgs — not just set by Hubbard in 1983, but set by Miscavige as the criteria for the release of the long-promised OT IX and X. It was in 2003 or 2004 that he came up with his “Why” for orgs NOT becoming St. Hill size. That is the “Ideal Org” program. Dozens of “ideal orgs” have been created since then — empty buildings every one. Bigger real estate holdings, but not a single St Hill Size org.
And despite his promises of leading them to the promised land, the sheeple have been following the pied piper of bankruptcy as he has fleeced them of hundreds of millions of dollars, bought numerous wasteful buildings, and continues to play his flute, convincing these fools that empty real estate is “saving the planet.”
Overts and withholds and service facsimiles
BTs and clusters and routes to infinity
PTS people that SPs cave in
These are a few of my least favorite things
When the hard sell is just hard hell
When the stats have crashed
I simply say screw all my least favorite things
And then I don’t feel so bad!
I was on a chat group on Telegram and there was this guy on it trying to disseminate scientology, someone asked him for a link so that they could read about it, he said there is no link and that they would have to come in to the org in London to find out about scientology, so what I done was to post a link to a site where you can read pdfs and download them, the link was to True Source Scientology Foundation ,
https://stss.nl/ . After I posted the link and told the forum members that they could read about it here, he went crazy on the chat forum, he said its copyright material, that I am going to be f**ked up by RTC for posting the link, that he has reported me to RTC. All this just because I posted a link !
This all happened just yesterday, the forum moderators deleted the link and all the posts and three of us were banned from the chat forum.
Does anyone here know, could RTC have done anything about posting that link on that Telegram chat group? would it have been ok for the moderators to leave that link to True Source on the forum ?
Sounds to me like someone from inside the cult was paid to write that message.
I strongly doubt anything bad could ever have happened to you for posting that message.
Hector, I think in cases like that it’s often members fishing for the FSM commissions they would get if they did succeed in getting someone to buy books and pay for courses. That all members of the CofS are technically commissioned salespeople who stand to make a lot of money, is one of the dirty secrets that ought to be more widely known (they get away with it in part because it’s not something people would ever think of a ‘church’ doing) – and taken into consideration regarding the organization’s tax status.
He has been on that chat forum for weeks now, writing a lot about scientology. Someone asked him for a link so they could read about it and he said there is no site on the internet where you can read about scientology, so when I posted that link to True Source he went bat shit crazy – threating members and moderators to remove the link or else.
I think he was trying to sell materials and courses for the commission that he would get.
He wanted forum members to come in to london org, I do not think anyone on that chat forum was even remotely interested in scientology.
If it’s a “piece of cake,” then why haven’t they been able to do it for decades? It’s like hitchhiking – between people learning the dangers, the vanishing of a particular youth culture and other changes in conditions, it just doesn’t really work as it once did.
They sound delusional to talk as if dissemination can succeed, when it no one has gotten it to anywhere for the longest time. Plus on top of it all is the fact that Scientology literally now has the worst reputation of any group, sharing the bottom of the barrel with Satanism.
Literal piece of cake…. I wonder if it were chocalte or vanilla
Well Mike, you might as well shut this place down.
$ci. is going to start rolling now and there will be no stopping it.
(I crack myself up, sometimes.)
now, now. Let’s not call him “Captain Miscavige” – that’s disrespectful, apparently.
Let’s call him by his proper title, defendant Miscavige.
The disturbing aspect of all this is that the “truth” of empty buildings and failed Scientology doesn’t mean anything to Scientologists. The evidence of failure is easily ignored as time has demonstrated.
The “truth will set you free” is a manufactured lie, but possibly, “honesty will set you free” is a far better concept to grasp and use. To the corrupt and corrupted, honesty is the terror they fear and block out the most.
It could be suggested applied Scientology per its own policy is presented and enforced as the politics of the mind. Ohhhh, a shiver just ran down my spine thinking about my time on staff and what I was immersed in.
Also the Hubbard term, “what is true for you is true,” is also a very convenient way of avoiding honesty.
There’s an enormous amount of dishonesty contained within the mind of a Scientologist in good standing. Good standing in what? Try as I may I just can’t get that to rhyme with ‘the most ethic group on the planet.’
GREAT, ASTUTE COMMENTS!
Don’t actualky look, just…OBEY!
The great Hublardian Genius has “taped” the path for you; how difficult is it to simply postulate and persist and stay on it, common sense and critical thinking and “woggish” human decency be damned?
“Shortcomings”? Mikey! That one was a little TOO easy!
Does that mean Davey suffers from diminutive ejaculations? Or is that the tribble on his head when it sees a particularly fetching/sexy wig or toupée?
Thinks: Hm, unless Davey is fantasising about the Big TC, then it’s firehose time. Unthinks.
There is no start to Mr Mickiewicz’s talents?
An ex who was fleeced by Missy Cabbage lost her home, job and savings and wound up having to live in the only thing left, her car. Wonder if she could have been given a “bunk” in one of the ideal morgues Missy Cabbage bought with her funds? Oh no, that would be rewarding a downstat wouldn’t it. Fucking bloodsucking heartless CULT.
Miscavige never has been honestly representative of the characteristics of an auditor. For instance, when I did the Flag auditor internship, your TRs were graded by the Internship Course Supervisor Brian LIvingston and David Mayo. You recorded your auditing session “TRs” (auditor “beingness”) with a tape cassette and handed in the tape cassete to Brian who graded it.
Brian was fond of correcting your “presence” for which there is the Hubbard writing “Auditor’s Presence” and within that writing are Hubbard’s criteria for the beingness of the auditor.
Later in the late 70s or 80s Hubbard came out with some additional TR writings, one for how an accomplished auditor with years of auditing behind their belt, were to polish up their auditor beingness, their presence, kind of similar to a therapist’s “doctor’s bedside manner” of treating the patient empathetically or similarly.
NOTHING in Miscavige is of that nature. Miscavige by his own vicious nature has pretty much ruined any respect he can honestly ever receive back, for his lack of auditor beingness.
A leader of Scientology who has lost the view of the auditor beingness that an auditor has to possess to do the Hubbard pseudo-therapy/exorcism to another person.
ARC is a key factor. Miscavige mostly always lacks ARC in his presence. He is menacing. He is threatening. And those around him unless like his step-and-fetch-it closest entourage personnel, learn to fear his unpredictable wrath. We honestly don’t have recent years close ex colleagues and underlings to listen to incidents of recent years blowups and wrath overspilled from him though.
His reputation is pretty much shot in the minds of the ex top people who’ve quit in the last 10 plus years though.
What is reputation for being a feared horrible non-auditor presence “leader” we do need some updates from some recent defectors who have witnessed firsthand Miscavige’s most recent years blowups and wrath delivering career shattering outpourings he priorly delivered and ruined and traumatized the minds of those around him in the top ranks of Scientology.
I dread to read too much of Miscavige’s loathsome dreadful behavior outburst, what can the movement do?
They are stuck with him for there is no way to dislodge him.
The wrathful loathsome “Pope” but he truly is in no way a “Pope” but rather a non characteristic non-auditor beingness. He’s put his finger on so many of the role model behaviors of Scientologist roles which Hubbard laid out in Hubbard’s policies for how Scientology different staff members are to behave.
Miscavige has amped up the irreligious already nasty and bad behavior role model behaviors Hubbard set out in Hubbard’s irreligious writings.
That is why Hubbard is at bottom the leader in chief/founder of some of the most horrible irreligious role model behaviors of Scientology’s “top managers”.
Per “Essay On Management” Miscavige’s role as Chairman of the Board, even, is a huge unappreciated but Freudian slip major error for Hubbard even to have allowed the naming of such a “top manager” role for Scientology.
“Chairman of the Board” in no way is the empathetic compassionate “auditor beingness” role to begin with.
The “if you see WDC SMI spit on him for me” is one of the permanent behind the scenes irreligious orders from Hubbard in 1982 it was ordered, I thought when I read this Hubbard comment in one of the 1982 snippets of LRH’s traffic, I think it was to CO CMO Int who was Marc Yager at the time, that this tiny “if you see WDC SMI spit on him for me” was completely figurative, since WDC SMI was the very tame very polite John Aczel at that time of this LRH comment.
I don’t think Miscavige can outgrow the irreligious confines of Hubbard’s orders and policies which drive his already nasty innate personality to be even more irreligious in his “beingness.”
But if official Scientology is ever to outgrow itself from its irreligiousness “beingness” it will be only when auditor Scientologists quit, go out and do the auditor role, with ARC and they individually have themselves that sort of natural “medical doctor beside manner” compassionate empathy already in their DNA and upbringing.
It is hard to repair a nasty wrathful loathsome threatening “beingness” out of a sick minded “top manger” and that is all that Miscavige seemingly will ever be. His reputation as a auditor role model will never be.
———————————
I remember on the many years I was on the RPF, sometimes someone who was a manager, became totally “valance” shifted back into a compassionate auditor beingness, even if only briefly, while on the RPF. Some of the OSA staffers I thought became remarkable “auditor” beingness people while in the confines of their RPF years, which was a valance shift for them.
How to valance shift the Scientologists who’ve been “beingness role modeled” into Miscavige’s valance during Miscavige’s reign, will be a long process, if it ever does occur.
It will only occur likely once Miscavige is gone, and wave of “new broom” people come along in the generations ahead, if that is possibe.
Hubbard made truly a mess of his movement, it’s all Hubbard’s fault the deeper one goes into all of Hubbard’s writings and sees the moment, day, week, month by moment, day, week, month final years of Hubbard’s control of the Scientology movement.
—————————————————-
The lack of internal discussion about Hubbard, the disallowance of taking Hubbard to task for Hubbard’s wrong deep problematic writings for running the movement, and the Hubbard putting a “top manager” in control of the movement, a “Chairman of the Board” “top manager” instead of putting the Senior C/S int in control of the movement, is a pivotal mistake.
I think a deeper study could be done, but never will be, on the weeds of how LRH did have this “tech” person as being the sort of “Pope” of the movement role, but always the “Pope” type “top tech” (meaning top auditor and case supervisor person role model) as subservient to the “top manager” administrative boss of the movement.
it is like factually the Hubbard “administrator” role is incompatible with the “top auditor” role model position for the movement.
The final executive top management setup is factually incongruent with how any religion ought ever to take as it’s religious movement model.
And Miscavige’s irreligious devolved role truly is abhorrent and irreligious.
Never do Scientology, maybe read in horror about this problem, but if anything, join a squirrel Scientologist group and only one with compassionate empathetic practicers of the Hubbard past lives pseudo-therapy and the Hubbard exorcism practices.
That is what the subject is to me in hindsight, just the pseudo-therapy and the exorcism, really.
The administrative dominant part of Scientology is sick, and that irreligious sickness in administrative running of Scientology can’t really be edited out of official Scientology, so splinter “squirrel” Scientology Scientologists can focus on the ARC auditor beingness, really, but would I even suggest that.
Not really since to me now, the soul theories of Hubbard are supernatural beliefs which cannot be proven scientifically, so it’s just more of the similar world history of some mystical or religious groups with their supernatural beliefs. Scientology’s/Hubbard’s supernatural beliefs taken from long standing world religions and mystical groups are woven into the Hubbard past lives pseudo-therapy and Hubbard exorcism. That is not attractive really, to a lot of people.
“Scientology Beliefs: No Beating Around the Running Pole” type of concise book, about the soul memories alleviation core supposed efforts of Scientology, could be written. A small book, or chapter.
Is there nothing Mr. Mickiewicz can’t do?
He seems to have a few small shortcomings:
Telling the truth
Appearing in public
Expanding scientology
I think legitimate expansion of Scientology by anyone, not even Hubbard, is possible, since the content of the subject is quackery.
It’s just a slow process of followers wising up and quitting, while newbies fall for the false promises of Hubbard’s replacing the quitters.
There is no accumulating expansion, and the movement’s only ebbed and flowed with sometimes more stayers who haven’t yet become quitters.
Quitters have outweighed the stayers for generations now. That tide won’t ever change.
Telling the truth was certainly a SHORTcoming when it came to that driving licence that said he was 6 foot tall… a short coming indeed…