If by chance you have not seen this piece on 60 Minutes Australia from last Sunday, I commend you to do so… The Australian media pull no punches, and this is one carries on the tradition. In the introduction alone they talk about scientology’s “mob-style operations” and how it is “bullying” and “belligerent.”
On their website (they don’t include any of the response in the televised piece), Channel 9 includes the scientology response. Literally a series of blatant lies:
Statement from The Church of Scientology
“The Church does not prohibit or discourage members from reporting criminal conduct of anyone — Scientologists or not — to law enforcement.
“Quite the opposite. Church policy explicitly demands Scientologists abide by all laws of the land.
“All allegations to the contrary are TOTALLY FALSE.
“There is not a scintilla of evidence supporting the scandalous allegations that the Church harassed the accusers.
“Every single instance of supposed harassment by the Church has been debunked.
“This includes frivolous lawsuits which have been issued against the Church and which have been dismissed by the Courts, resulting in instances of complainants being ordered to pay costs to the Church.”
I am going to take this apart sentence by sentence:
The Church does not prohibit or discourage members from reporting criminal conduct of anyone — Scientologists or not — to law enforcement.
As always, it seems they have forgotten they sell Introduction to Scientology Ethics book, which lists the following High Crimes (Suppressive Acts):
Delivering up the person of a Scientologist without defense or protest to the demands of civil or criminal law.
Reporting or threatening to report Scientology or Scientologists to civil authorities in an effort to suppress Scientology or Scientologists from practicing or receiving standard Scientology.
Public statements against Scientology or Scientologists but not to Committees of Evidence duly convened.
And more generally, in the same book, Hubbard, in one of his last writings, expresses the attitude they have towards law enforcement, warning scientologists not to participate in the “wog” (non-scientology) justice system:
As they themselves are contaminated by their criminal associates, the police and court systems are, in the main, composed of downstats who couldn’t make it in life any other way.
Societies traditionally cave in through their police and justice systems, since these provide a channel of contamination between the vicious and lawless, and decent people.
There is little thought of administering justice so that individuals can improve. There is every thought to punish and create misery.
Justice systems thereby become a sort of cancer which erode every splendid ambition and achievement of the decent citizen.
“Justice” apparently cannot be trusted in the hands of Man.
You can see the full document here: NEW HOPE FOR JUSTICE
To a scientologist, turning someone over to “wog” justice is cruelty.
Scientologists believe that someone who commits a crime can only be cured by scientology auditing. Hubbard admonishes scientologists:
All evil stems from aberration. And it can be pretty evil. And awfully aberrated. The only road out from evil is processing.
Aberration here refers to non-optimum conditions or conduct. Processing is scientology auditing. Turning someone over to law enforcement prevents them from “receiving standard scientology.”
Quite the opposite. Church policy explicitly demands Scientologists abide by all laws of the land.
Ask a scientologist to show you this “policy” and they will refer to The Way to Happiness —specifically NOT “church policy” but a “secular moral code” which cannot be enforced.
This is also a sleazy word game. For the most part, not reporting a crime does not mean an individual has broken the law.
All allegations to the contrary are TOTALLY FALSE.
After reading their published policies above, this is complete bs. Scientology often asserts provably untrue things, relying on the fact that unsuspecting people will simply believe it on the basis that “nobody would be that stupid as to make a provably false statement.”
There is not a scintilla of evidence supporting the scandalous allegations that the Church harassed the accusers.
More lies. There is tons of evidence laid out in the civil case filed by the victims of Masterson. It has not yet been adjudicated by the court because it was on hold pending the criminal prosecution. This will now go forward and a jury will have the opportunity to determine whether this is the case or not. There is a lot more than a scintilla of evidence.
Let’s not forget that the harassment is pursuant to scientology policy. Policy that cannot change and has been in effect since the 1960’s. Here is what the US Department of Justice had to say about scientology harassment in the prosecution of 11 top scientology officials who ended up pleading guilty and going to prison for a massive harassment campaign in the 1970’s:
Here are just two quotes from that document:
[They] considered themselves above the law. They believed that they had carte blanche to violate the rights of others, frame critics in order to destroy them, burglarize private and public offices and steal documents…
The defendants and their cohorts launched vicious smear campaigns, spreading falsehoods against those they perceived to be enemies of Scientology in order to discredit them and, in some instances, cause them to lose their employment.
That is a lot more than a “scintilla” of evidence.
Every single instance of supposed harassment by the Church has been debunked.
Erm, no it hasn’t. In fact, they cannot point to a single instance that HAS been debunked. The instances of harassment are ALL pending before the courts.
This includes frivolous lawsuits which have been issued against the Church and which have been dismissed by the Courts, resulting in instances of complainants being ordered to pay costs to the Church.
This is also blatantly false.
These so-called “frivolous lawsuits” have not been “dismissed by the courts.”
- Valerie Haney case was sent by the court to scientology’s fake arbitration procedure. It has not been dismissed.
- Masterson victims case was sent by the court to fake scientology arbitration, but overturned on appeal, and remains pending the completion of the criminal case (sentencing) of Masterson.
- Baxter/Guider case was also sent by the trial court to fake scientology arbitration, and is pending appeal of that order.
- Leah Remini case is very much alive and pending before the court in Los Angeles.
In fact, none of these “frivolous” lawsuits alleging harassment have been “dismissed by the Courts.”
The only case where the complainants were ordered to “pay costs to the Church” was the Headley case in 2012.
Subsequent to that, scientology filed a frivolous lawsuit against Debbie Cook and ended up paying to settle the case they filed, an amount dwarfing the $40,000 the court ordered the Headley’s to pay.
Once again, unless you are willing to spend the time and have the resources to research the scientology bs they send to the media, their lies piled on lies go unchecked.
Perhaps 60 Minutes could do a follow up piece concerning the “church” lying response….
PeaceMaker says
It strikes me that the CofS’ “scripture” is to lie and do harm – that’s why it’s not like a religion. And while that policy may pro forma say that members shouldn’t violate the law, is not in any way contradictory with other prohibitions against them being reported to authorities if they do.
I’m looking forward to the day when they will be judged guilty of harassment, at least civilly. But thanks for pointing out that the DOJ laid out how they do so in an official document.
And the criminal convictions of executives including the founder’s wife in the Snow White case, plus I believe at least one civil case, bolster that harassment is in fact a ‘church’ policy.
Thanks for this, it’s a really concise and powerful take-down.
Mockingbird says
Remember! Fleet Admiral David Miscavige has made it perfectly clear! Scientology doesn’t fair game anyone ever! And will ruthlessly fair game anyone who says otherwise!
Mary says
Thank you Mike! Any scientologist who was in for any length of time can tell you that they would not report a fellow scientologist of a crime; they would handle it internally.
In fact, I personally can tell you of someone who was declared a Suppressive Person for getting a lawyer to put a restraining order on she and her husband’s finances. (He was donating too much of their money [and at the time wanted a divorce].)
PlanetshipT says
Wow, a corporate media entity with a spine. Color me impressed and, dare I say, hopeful?
xTeamXenu75to03chuckbeatty says
Outstanding show.
Yawn says
Wow, what an incredible public broadside into Scientology!
Bit off the track maybe, but Field Marshal Erwin Rommel was once rumored to have said, “If I was to attack hell, I’d have the Australians take it and the New Zealanders hold it.” Such a pain in the butt they were to him in North Africa.
Once the Aussie media gets stirred up the gloves truly come off. Let’s just hope law enforcement somewhere follows their lead.
Dead Men Tell No Tales Bill Straass says
I have nothing against Erwin Rommel. I may have even met him. But I have total certainty that I have talked to DM five or more times.
otherles says
I didn’t know that! I thought I was a History Geek.
Yawn says
It was mostly the Australian Engineers that breached their minefields.
Zee Moo says
If it weren’t for the lying, what would $cientology be?
Yawn says
Haha! A true static, holding no position in time and space.
Goldie says
Starting at about five minutes into this video, Blinky McBlinkyFace (Monique Yingling) CONFIRMS that felonies were handled WITHIN scientology (“as an internal matter” are her exact words), NOT via law enforcement. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFHsrKyWET0&list=PL97bG9F7T-UfbWG17flpaFJg8pUw75W89&index=7
Free Minds, Free Hearts says
Wow Goldie, this is well worth watching.
Glenn says
Great piece Mike!
Karen is just following Blubbard policy; never defend, always attack. But you know the truth and expose her completely.
Looking forward to the cult’s demise and the sooner the better. Wish the IRS would rescind the tax exemption. The whales would cease donating and rush the downfall.